Volume 11, Issue 1 (February 2024)                   Avicenna J Neuro Psycho Physiology 2024, 11(1): 32-38 | Back to browse issues page

Ethics code: IR.IAU.KHUISF.REC.1402.025


XML Print


Download citation:
BibTeX | RIS | EndNote | Medlars | ProCite | Reference Manager | RefWorks
Send citation to:

Akhtarian S, Bahramipour Isfahani M, Manshaee G. Comparison of the Effectiveness of Healthy Body Image Package (HBIP) and Cognitive-Behavioral Therapy (CBT) on Self-Esteem in 12 to 15-Year-Old Adolescents with Body Dissatisfaction. Avicenna J Neuro Psycho Physiology 2024; 11 (1) :32-38
URL: http://ajnpp.umsha.ac.ir/article-1-476-en.html
1- PhD Student in Psychology, Department of Psychology, Isfahan(khorasgan) Branch, Islamic Azad University, Isfahan, Iran
2- Assistant Professor, Department of Psychology, Faculty of Educational Sciences and Psychology, Islamic Azad University, Isfahan(Khorasgan) Branch, Isfahan, Iran , bahramipourisfahani@yahoo.com
3- Associate Professor, Department of Psychology, Faculty of Educational Sciences and Psychology, Islamic Azad University, Isfahan(Khorasgan)Branch, Isfahan, Iran
Full-Text [PDF 819 kb]   (544 Downloads)     |   Abstract (HTML)  (2530 Views)
Full-Text:   (366 Views)
Background
Mental preoccupation with physical appearance is a major issue among adolescents in contemporary societies, leading to significant physical and psychological problems [1]. In the present era, with the widespread use of mass media and the opportunity for constant comparison, concerns related to one’s appearance and body shape have become a significant worry. Individuals excessively pay attention to and focus on their physical appearance [2]. During adolescence, individuals experience multifaceted changes due to the process of puberty, which can potentially have profound effects on an adolescent’s life. For instance, the most noticeable of these changes is the heightened sensitivity that adolescents naturally develop toward their physical appearance [3].
While attention to appearance is a normal human characteristic, excessive focus on certain body aspects can create numerous problems for an individual [4]. In other words, excessive attention to specific body aspects causes distress and dissatisfaction, which is termed body image dissatisfaction [5]. Body image is defined as an individual’s internal perceptions of the physical aspects of their body and how they feel about it [6]. Nowadays, body dissatisfaction has become a global phenomenon, often accompanied by excessive behaviors aimed at correcting perceived body issues [7]. Body dissatisfaction includes concerns and mental preoccupation regarding a perceived flaw in appearance or an exaggerated mental emphasis on a partial defect. Researchers explicitly state that during certain periods of adolescence, individuals engage in obsessive behaviors (e.g., mirror checking and excessive makeup) or mental activities (e.g., comparing their appearance with others), and this mental preoccupation can lead to significant clinical, emotional distress or noticeable impairment in functioning in critical life domains [8].
Mental health professionals, recognizing the importance of physical appearance in social interactions and interpersonal relationships, have conducted numerous studies in this field. Their findings indicate that individuals with continuous mental preoccupation about their physical appearance, despite having a natural or nearly natural appearance, report excessive and distressing fears of their own unattractiveness [4]. Body image dissatisfaction is among the diverse and more common mental disorders among individuals seeking cosmetic clinics, imposing considerable costs on the healthcare system of countries due to often being overlooked in diagnosis [9].
One influential variable affecting body image dissatisfaction is self-esteem. Self-esteem is a crucial concept during adolescence [10]. Lowering adolescents’ self-esteem intensifies anxiety. Adolescents with low self-esteem are less self-reliant, constantly seeking approval from others, and often consider others’ evaluations of their appearance. This heightened sensitivity can elevate their anxiety, and in severe cases, body image dissatisfaction accompanied by low self-esteem can serve as a precursor to clinical disorders, such as eating disorders or body dysmorphic disorder [11].
In recent years, psychological interventions within the broad cognitive-behavioral framework, alongside other treatments, have gained attention for assisting individuals with body image dissatisfaction, particularly adolescents. In addition to the expansion of adolescents’ capabilities through enhancing healthy body image for the promotion of adolescents’ psychological and emotional well-being, there is also a recognized need to improve emotional, cognitive, and social developmental pathways in adolescents. Cash’s cognitive behavioral therapy (CBT) approach has been particularly valuable in addressing these concerns [12]. It is a practical individual or group method that, through its teachings, shapes adolescents’ norms, motivations, perceptions, and behaviors, leading to better adaptability with oneself, one’s surrounding community, and others [13]. Studies have shown that the eight-step Cash model of CBT is effective in enhancing negative body image in girls [14], improving psychological well-being in women with breast cancer [15], and fostering positive body image and commitment in relationships [16].
Therefore, considering that the lack of healthy body image can pose a challenging, unnatural, and stressful situation for adolescents, and taking into account the role of supportive factors in educational interventions for body image dissatisfaction, the main research question was whether the healthy body image package (HBIP) and the CBT, based on the cognitive-behavioral approach framework, principles, and rules, were effective on the self-esteem of 12-15-year-old adolescents with body image dissatisfaction.

Objectives
This research aims to determine the effectiveness of a Healthy Body Image Package (HBIP) and Cognitive-Behavioral Therapy (CBT) on self-esteem in 12-15-year-old adolescents with body dissatisfaction.

Materials and Methods
The present study is semi-experimental research with a three-group design, including an HBIP training group, a CBT group for body dissatisfaction, and a control group. The research was conducted in three stages: pre-test, post-test, and follow-up. The statistical population comprised all adolescents aged 12 to 15 with body dissatisfaction in Isfahan’s high schools during the academic year 2023-2024. Sixty adolescents were purposefully selected, with 20 individuals assigned to each of the three study groups, meeting the minimum statistical power requirement of 0.8 for experimental and semi-experimental studies.
Randomization was done through simple random sampling to assign participants to the three groups. After the study, 2 individuals from the healthy body image group and 4 from the cognitive-behavioral treatment group experienced dropouts, reducing the respective group sizes to 18 and 16 participants. Inclusion criteria involved willingness to participate, absence of psychological disorders, not undergoing psychiatric treatments, age between 12 to 15 years, and obtaining a maximum score of 30 on the body satisfaction questionnaire. Ethical considerations included confidentiality, using data solely for research purposes without disclosing names, participants’ full freedom to withdraw, accurate result communication upon request, obtaining a written commitment from participants, and securing an ethical code from the ethics committee.
Post-training for the control group was provided if desired by participants in a condensed format after completing the training sessions. Data were collected using specific scales.

1. Body Areas Satisfaction Scale
The study utilized a 9-item from the Body Areas Satisfaction questionnaire, which was created by Cash et al. in 1990, to evaluate body dissatisfaction by examining individuals’ perceptions of various aspects of their body image [17]. This scale is applicable to individuals aged 12 and older, demonstrating reliability and validity. It evaluates satisfaction with various body areas, including the face, upper body, mid-torso and lower torso, muscle tone, weight, height, and overall appearance. This is a self-report tool, and the replies are rated on a 5-point Likert scale ranging from “Very Satisfied” to “Very Dissatisfied.” Scores fluctuate between 9 and 45, with higher scores indicating greater satisfaction with different body areas. Cash et al. reported internal consistency reliability for the body satisfaction scale as 0.86 [17]. In a study conducted by Hashemian et al., Cronbach’s alpha was calculated for the Body Image Attitude Questionnaire and its subscale, resulting in a Cronbach’s alpha value of 0.92 for the body satisfaction subscale, indicating desirable reliability [18].

2. Self-esteem Contingency Questionnaire for Adolescents
This questionnaire, developed by Wouters et al. (2016), was used to measure self-respect [19]. This questionnaire prompts adolescents to express their thoughts and feelings in various situations. The scale is structured as a situational-response questionnaire, designed to enhance the content validity of the questionnaire. The situations encompass three positive (e.g., an invitation to a party) and three negative (e.g.,
when my hair is messy) conditions. Based on multidimensional self-esteem models and questionnaires, it covers events in six different domains significant to adolescents. Consistent with self-respect definitions, items directly refer to changes in self-respect or changes in adolescents’ self-descriptions of thoughts and feelings about themselves.

This questionnaire comprises 24 items and 8 subscales. Each subscale includes three items, and scoring is based on a 6-point Likert scale. The examination of the psychometric properties of this instrument by Cronbach’s alpha coefficient method resulted in a score range of 0.67 to 0.78 for its subscales [19]. The range of retest and split-half coefficients indicated the satisfactory reliability of this tool, and factor analysis results supported its factorial structure [20]. After conducting the pre-test and randomly assigning participants to the three groups, the HBIP and CBT were implemented over eight 90-120-minute sessions each for the HBIP and CBT groups [13, 21]. The control group did not receive any intervention and remained on a waiting list. At the end of the therapeutic sessions, the post-test was administered to all three groups. The titles of therapy sessions and a brief description of each therapy session are provided in Tables 1 and 2.
The study’s data were analyzed using repeated measures analysis of variance (ANOVA) and Bonferroni post-hoc test. The analysis was conducted in.

Table 1. Brief description of sessions in the HBIP group [21]
Sessions Summary of sessions
First Introduction, acquaintance, and setting practical and applied goals for the course. Implementation of pre-test. Basic familiarity with the concept, roles, and dimensions of healthy mindfulness. Group discussion on positive and negative body perceptions, behavioral aspects, and healthy nutrition based on members’ experiences. Introduction to the cognitive aspect of healthy body perception and the possibility of enhancing it. Teaching techniques for internal awareness of body organs and their functions. Summary of the first session and assignment for home.
Second
Self-care training for responding to the body’s perceived needs in a healthy manner. Mindfulness self-care techniques to enhance perception alignment with reality about one’s body and its functions. Teaching awareness and absorption of supportive resources and expanding awareness levels regarding the body beyond appearance. Summary of the second session and assignment for home.
Third
Introduction to the emotional dimension of healthy body perception and methods to enhance it. Teaching self-compassion strategies regarding the body and its functions. Instruction on coping with shame and strengthening self-esteem. Summary of the third session and assignment for home.
Fourth
Teaching expressive and emotional writing about the body and body parts. Instruction on regulating negative and positive emotions about the body. Summary of the fourth session and assignment for home.
Fifth
Introduction and familiarity with the cognitive dimension of healthy body perception and methods to enhance it. Teaching mindfulness techniques to enhance healthy and positive body perception (coping with cognitive distortions and ineffective beliefs). Teaching positive self-talk about the body and appearance (replacing cognitive distortions and ineffective beliefs). Summary of the fifth session and assignment for home.
Sixth
Introduction and familiarity with the behavioral dimension of healthy body perception and methods to enhance it. Training behavioral planning readiness for action. Teaching behavioral self-monitoring comprehensively. Teaching behavioral exposure exercises. Summary of the sixth session and assignment for home.
Seventh
Teaching acceptance and gratitude strategies for the body and appearance to enhance healthy and positive body perception. Teaching conditional evaluation and cognitive restructuring techniques (continuation of replacing cognitive distortions and ineffective beliefs). Summary of the seventh session and assignment for home
Eighth
Stress management training and coping strategies with negative body perception. Teaching behavioral prevention of returning to dissatisfaction with body perception. Summary of the teaching sessions, presenting assignments for home, and conducting post-test.

Table 2. Brief description of sessions in CBT by Cash [13]
Sessions Summary of sessions
First Introduction to the therapist and group members, evaluation of body perception, explanation of rules and expectations. A brief overview of the cognitive-behavioral approach, followed by an introduction to the cognitive therapy approach through participant self-assessment of body image levels using questionnaires.
Second Review of the previous session’s assignment, exploration of visible and mental reflections in the mirror regarding secondary sexual characteristics resulting from puberty changes, and learning the ABCs of body image.
Third Review of the previous session’s assignment, creating satisfying reflections and discovering emotional body perceptions, teaching relaxation and desensitization with the mirror.
Fourth Review of the previous session’s assignment, establishing logical doubts about the harmed body, therapist’s emphasis on negative assumptions, and challenging irrational thoughts through cognitive reconstruction techniques and listening to their new inner voices. Presenting D and E in the ABC model.
Fifth Review of the previous session’s assignment, correcting private body conversations by corrective thoughts (D), and presenting examples of corrective thoughts in group sessions based on adolescents’ statements.
Sixth Breaking self-destructive behaviors about their bodies and facing situations they avoid and worry about, evaluating situations related to body dissatisfaction.
Seventh Focusing on the rights of the body, paying attention to positive aspects of the body, and the therapist encouragement to give a present to themselves. Discussing goals and future plans in adolescents’ lives to gain a new perspective on their body after physical changes due to puberty and presenting solutions to overcome some removable barriers.
Eighth Protecting positive body perception (preventing relapse) – group members expressing their achievements, a summary of concepts discussed in each session, and summarizing discussions.
Results
Current data from the research were analyzed in SPSS-26 software using repeated measures ANOVA and Bonferroni post-hoc test. Examining the mean and standard deviation of self-esteem revealed differences in the post-test and follow-up stages between the HBIP and CBT Image Therapy groups when compared to the control group (Table 3).
Before performing the repeated measures ANOVA, the conducted examinations indicated that normal distribution was only observed in the positive self-esteem component during the pre-test stage (P<0.05). Equality of error variance was also established only at the pre-test stage (P<0.05). The equality of variance-covariance matrices (assessed by the Box’s test) was not confirmed (P>0.05). In the negative self-esteem component, normal distribution was not observed in all three test stages (P>0.05). Moreover, Mauchly’s test was significant for both self-esteem components (P<0.05), indicating that the sphericity assumption for these variables was not met. In cases where the sphericity assumption is violated, the Greenhouse-Geisser correction can be used in the final analysis tables. The result of the repeated measures ANOVA showed a significant difference in the investigated variable between the HBIP group, CBT Body Image group, and the control group (Table 4).

Table 3. Mean and standard deviation of the variable self-esteem in the research groups at three stages
Control Cash package Healthy body image package Time Variable
Mean Standard deviation Mean Standard deviation Mean Standard deviation
45.190 7.101 44.19 12.368 45.280 10.862 Pre-test Positive Self-esteem
45.250 7.113 58.188 11.979 67.778 4.166 Post-test
45.875 7.509 58.500 11.922 68/944 3.992 Follow-up
12.225 46.630 11.234 47.750 11.052 44.170 Pre-test Negative Self-esteem
12.323 46.875 10.731 31.313 4.298 20.000 Post-test
12.181 46.875 10.532 31.438 4.642 20.389 Follow-up

Table 4. Repeated measures ANOVA results for self-esteem
Variable Effect Source Sum of Squares Degrees of Freedom Mean Squares F Ratio Significance Partial Eta Squared Observed Power
Positive Self-esteem Within-Group Time 5367.271 1.034 5190.269 256.190 0.000 0.845 1.000  
Time × Group Interaction 3058.773 2.068 1478.951 73.001 0.000 0.756 1.000  
Error (Time) 984.667 48.603 20.259 - - - -  
Between-Group Group 6154.598 2 3077.299 13.739 0.000 0.369 0.997  
Error 10527.063 47 223.980 - - - -  
Negative Self-esteem Within-Group Time 5937.176 1.023 5805.418 190.562 0.000 0.802 1.000  
Time × Group Interaction 3418.715 2.045 1671.423 54/864 0.000 0.700 1.000  
Error (Time) 1464.338 48.067 3.465 - - - -  
Between-Group Group 8797.962 2 4398.981 15.520 0.000 0.398 0.999  
Error 13322.065 47 283.448 - - - -  
Table 5. Bonferroni post hoc tests for pairwise group comparisons in self-esteem
Variable Row Base Group Comparison Group Mean Differences Standard Error Significance
Time 1 Pre-test Post-test **-12.521 0.781 0.000  
2 Pre-test Follow-up **-12.889 0.798 0.000  
3 Post-test Follow-up *-0.368 0.120 0.011  
Positive Self-esteem 4 Healthy Body Image Package Cach Package *7.375 2.969 0.050  
7 Healthy Body Image Package Control **15.562 2.969 0.000  
9 Cach Package Control *8.188 3.055 0.030  
Time 1 Pre-test Post-test **13.451 0.976 0.000  
2 Pre-test Follow-up **13.280 0.953 0.000  
3 Post-test Follow-up -0.171 0.121 0.485  
Negative Self-esteem 4 Healthy Body Image Package Cach Package *-8.648 3.340 0.038  
7 Healthy Body Image Package Control **-18.606 3.340 0.000  
9 Cach Package Control *-9.958 3.340 0.017  
Due to the significant interaction with time in the components of self-esteem, the Bonferroni post hoc test was conducted to examine the pairwise differences between the experimental and control groups (Table 5).

Conclusions
This study aimed to investigate the effectiveness of the Healthy Body Image Education package and Cash Cognitive-Behavioral Body Image Therapy on the self-esteem of adolescents with body image dissatisfaction. The findings revealed that there was a significant difference in self-esteem between the Healthy Body Image Education group and the Cognitive-Behavioral Body Image Therapy group compared to the control group.
Results indicated that the positive self-esteem variable increased in the HBIP group, while the negative self-esteem component decreased more in this group. Due to the novel nature of this study, no available study was found directly comparing the effectiveness of the Healthy Body Image Education package with cognitive-behavioral therapy on self-esteem (both positive and negative) in adolescents aged 12 to 15 with body image dissatisfaction. However, the relative alignment of the results of this study with the findings of research carried out by Lewis-Smith et al. on the effectiveness of a mindfulness-based intervention on self-esteem in adolescents with body image dissatisfaction suggests potential congruence [22].
Explaining these findings, it can be said that self-esteem (both positive and negative) in the context of body image dissatisfaction in adolescents was easily weakened in the positive aspect and strengthened in the negative aspect. However, it was possible to facilitate the improvement of positive self-esteem along with the cessation of negative and destructive thoughts for this sense of self-esteem in adolescents dissatisfied with their body image by focusing on emotional techniques, such as teaching self-compassion strategies regarding the body and its functions, teaching coping strategies against shame, and enhancing self-esteem (session three) in the HBIP group. The ability to enhance self-esteem with the cessation of negative and destructive thoughts for the sense of self-esteem, further through cognitive and behavioral skills, such as teaching mindfulness along with behavioral prevention training to avoid a relapse into body image dissatisfaction, contributes to promoting positive self-esteem and reducing negative self-esteem in these adolescents. Therefore, the taught skills, including mindfulness training along with behavioral prevention training to avoid a relapse into body image dissatisfaction, teaching coping strategies against shame, and enhancing self-esteem, as part of the Healthy Body Image Education package, are considered crucial tools that significantly affect self-esteem (positive or negative) in adolescents dissatisfied with their body image.
The results of this study showing the effectiveness of Cognitive-Behavioral Body Image Therapy on the self-esteem (positive and negative) of adolescents with body image dissatisfaction were relatively in line with those reported by Farhadi et al. investigating the effectiveness of cognitive-behavioral group therapy on self-esteem in women dissatisfied with their body image [23].
These findings were also consistent with those suggested by Bavadi et al. in a study examining the effectiveness of CBT based on the eight-step model of Cash on the improvement of psychosocial well-being (considering that self-esteem is one of the central variables in psychosocial well-being) in women with breast cancer [15]. The reason for these alignments in study results is related to the nature of the variables discussed, which are all to some extent related to either negative or positive self-esteem in relationships.
In conclusion, the results of this study suggested that both the Healthy Body Image Education package and Cognitive-Behavioral Body Image Therapy had positive effects on the self-esteem of adolescents with body image dissatisfaction. The HBIP, with its emphasis on emotional techniques, provides a unique and comprehensive approach, potentially contributing to more significant improvements in self-esteem compared to traditional CBT. However, further research with larger sample sizes and diverse populations is needed to validate and generalize these findings.
In the current research, the effectiveness of Cash’s cognitive-behavioral body image therapy on self-esteem (both positive and negative aspects) was elucidated through the use of strategies and techniques to interrupt negative thoughts and beliefs that intensify feelings of worthlessness and dissatisfaction with one’s body. Negative cognitive and mental systems related to oneself and one’s body are crucial factors in exacerbating feelings of worthlessness resulting from negative evaluations [24].
The cognitive-behavioral approach reinforces positive self-esteem and self-worth regarding body satisfaction. This approach derives positive cognitions, accompanied by positive self-statements, from positive perceptions. Conversely, it recognizes negative self-esteem and worth as products of negative cognitions and self-statements [13]. Therefore, for adolescents and individuals struggling with body image dissatisfaction, the focus is specifically on enhancing positive cognitions and positive self-statements about the body and physical appearance. Strengthening positive cognitions and positive self-statements about the body and physical appearance provides a substantial foundation for promoting positive self-esteem and countering negative self-worth. Essentially, by implementing CBT, these positive cognitions and self-statements about the body and physical appearance aim to replace negative thoughts, beliefs, and attitudes, ultimately reinforcing positive self-esteem while diminishing negative self-worth [25].
The final point to consider is that it appears the greater effectiveness of healthy body image education compared to CBT on self-esteem (both positive and negative) is related to dedicating at least two sessions to healthy body image education. These sessions focused on cognitive skills (techniques and exercises related to positive and negative body image discussions, positive and negative consequences of body image, negative behavioral aspects of body image, positive behavioral aspects of body image, discussing healthy nutrition and harmful habits based on the lived experiences of each member, and teaching techniques for self-awareness and understanding of bodily organs and their functions) and then emotional and affective skills (including teaching self-compassion strategies regarding the body and its functions, teaching coping strategies against shame, enhancing self-esteem, teaching emotional and expressive writing about the body and its parts, and teaching strategies for regulating negative and positive emotions about the body). The simultaneous focus on the cognitive and emotional foundations of a positive and healthy body image in the Healthy Body Image Education package goes beyond the techniques presented in CBT, likely empowering adolescents more extensively in the realms of cognitive and emotional management. This comprehensive approach likely contributes to the higher effectiveness of healthy body image education compared to CBT on self-esteem (both positive and negative) in the outlined research.
This study, similar to other studies, has certain limitations. The first limitation was the restriction of the research population to adolescents aged 12 to 15 with dissatisfaction with body image in the high schools of Isfahan. Additionally, the economic and educational conditions of these students were not assessed and controlled in this research. Moreover, considering the characteristics of the statistical population, random sampling was not utilized in this study. Therefore, it is recommended that to enhance the generalizability of the results, this research should be conducted in other cities, the economic and educational conditions of students should be monitored and controlled, and a random sampling method should be employed at the design stage of the research.
Furthermore, given the effectiveness of healthy body image education and CBT on the self-esteem of adolescents with body dissatisfaction, it is recommended that educational authorities and planners recruit counselors and specialists in counseling centers and psychological services of that organization. Moreover, employing experienced psychologists in the field of body image and implementing adolescent-centered therapy can contribute to improving the self-esteem of adolescents, thus influencing their personal performance and learning.
Considering the results regarding the greater effectiveness of the healthy body image training package compared to the CBT package on self-esteem, it is suggested that initially, during the service, training courses for school counselors be prioritized as the first step in promoting healthy body image. Subsequently, CBT workshops should be organized as a second priority. In this regard, efforts should focus on enhancing the capacity and self-worth of the targeted adolescents.

Compliance with ethical guidelines
The studies involving human participants were reviewed and approved by the Ethics Committee of the Islamic Azad University of Isfahan (IR.IAU.KHUISF.REC.1402.025). The patients/participants provided their written informed consent to participate in this study.
Acknowledgments
This research is taken from the doctoral thesis of psychology with the ethics ID IR.IAU.KHUISF.REC.1402.025, and we are grateful to all the participant.

AuthorsΚΌ contributions
A. Sh., BI. M., and M. Gh. contributed to the study conception and design, material preparation, data collection, and analysis. All authors contributed to the article and approved the submitted version.

Funding/Support
This research did not receive any specific grant from funding agencies in the public, commercial, or not-for-profit sectors.

Conflicts of Interest
The authors declare that the research was conducted in the absence of any commercial or financial relationships that could be construed as a potential conflict of interest.

References
  1. Taylor J. The Body Image Workbook for Teens: Activities for Creating a Healthy Body Image in Girls in a World where Individuals are Obsessed with Body Image. Khalilinezhad M (Translator). Tehran: Arjmand Publications. 2020. [Link]
  2. Norouzi A, Maleki A, Parsamehr M, Ghasemi H. Investigating the Effect of Body Image and Body Management on the Sports Participation of Women in Ilam Province. Appl Sociol. 2018;29(4):99-122. [Link]
  3. Sabzavari H, Ghadiri F, Sharififar A. Investigating the Relationship between Physical Readiness Related to Health and Body Self-Esteem in Adolescents. Appl Res Sport Sci Educ. 2019;11(4):20-43.
  4. Sadock BJ, Sadock VA, Ruiz P. Summary of Psychiatry: Behavioral Sciences-Clinical Psychiatry. Volume One. Rezaei F (Translator). Tehran: Arjmand Publications. 2021. [Link]
  5. Saleh-Mirhosseini V, Rafieepoor A, Alavi S. Cognitive-Behavioral Treatment, Body Dysmorphic Disorder: A Review. Growth Psychol Sci.2020;9(8):71-78. [Link]
  6. Hajiyousef H, Dehstani M, Darvishmolla M. The Role of Emotional Regulation Difficulty in the Relationship between Harm Experience and Dissatisfaction with Adolescent Girls’ Body Image. J Appl Psychol Res.2022;13(1): 327-344. [DOI: 10.22059/japr.2022.321110.643801]
  7. Hicks RE, Kenny B, Stevenson S, Vanstone DM. Risk factors in body image dissatisfaction: gender, maladaptive self-esteem, and psychological well-being. Heliyon. 2022;8(6): e09745. [DOI: 10.1016/j.heliyon.2022.e09745] [PMID]
  8. Will D, Naziraoglu F. Body Dysmorphic Disorder, Treatment Guide. Ahmadi Tahoor Sultan M, Peymbari M (Translators). Tehran: Arjmand Publications. 2021. [Link]
  9. Ahmadvand Shahvari M, Besharat MA. Body Dysmorphic Disorder: A Review. Growth Psychol Sci. 2021;10(4):181-196. [Link]
  10. Arab-Mohabbishahrabi A, Pakdaman S, Heydari M. The Relationship between Self-Empowerment and Unstable Self-Esteem: The Mediating Role of Fear of Negative Evaluation. Evol Psychol: Iran Psychol.2016;13(50):143-155. [Link]
  11. Mohammadi N, Sajjadi-Nezhad MS. The Relationship between Concerns about Body Image, Fear of Negative Evaluation, and Self-Esteem with Social Anxiety. J Mod Psychol Res. 2007;2(5):55-70. [Link]
  12. Kang NR, Kwack YS. An Update on Mental Health Problems
    and Cognitive Behavioral Therapy in Pediatric Obesity. Pediatr Gastroenterol Hepatol Nutr. 2020;23(1):15-25.
    [DOI: 10.5223/pghn.2020.23.1.15] [PMID] [PMCID]
  13. Cash T. The Body Image Workbook (Body Image Psychology). Rayegan N (Translator). Tehran: Danjeh Publications.2010. [Link]
  14. Rayegan N, Shaieri MR, Asgari Moghadam MA. The Efficacy of Cognitive-Behavioral Therapy Based on the 8-Stage Model on Negative Body Image in Female University Students. Clin Psychol Pers. 2006;4(2):11-22. [Link]
  15. Bavadi B, Poursharifi H, LaffiCashani F. The Effectiveness of Cognitive-Behavioral Therapy Based on the 8-Stage Model on the Improvement of Psychological Well-being in Women with Breast Cancer. Iran J Breast Dis. 2015;8(4):41-51. [Link]
  16. Porfarahani M, Zamani-Nia F, Arianmaghdam Z, Aghamohammadian Shahrbaaf HR. The Effectiveness of an Eight-Stage Cognitive-Behavioral Group Therapy on Body Image and Marital Commitment. J Fam Pathol Couns Enrich. 2018;4(1):63-76. [Link]
  17. Brown TA, Cash TF, Mikulka PJ. Attitudinal body-image assessment: factor analysis of the Body-Self Relations Questionnaire. J Pers Assess. 1990;55(1-2):135-44. [DOI: 10.1080/00223891.1990.9674053] [PMID]
  18. Hashemian M, Aflak-Sir A, Goodarzi MA, Rahimi C. The Relationship between Attachment Style and Body Image in Female High School Students: The Mediating Role of Socio-Cultural Appearance and Self-Acceptance. Psychol Behav Sci Res. 2021;11(2):1-26. [DOI: 10.22108/cbs.2022.1315
    24.1598]
  19. Wouters S, Verschueren K, Briers V, Janssen R. Development and validation of a self-esteem contingency questionnaire for adolescents. Pers Individ Dif. 2016; 99:295–301. [DOI: 10.1016/j.paid.2016.05.001]
  20. Amiri S, Ghasemi Nawab A, Jamali Y. Psychometric characteristics of the conditional self-esteem questionnaire of adolescents. Transformational psychology (Iranian psychologists). 2015;13(50):209-19. [Link]
  21. Akhtarian Sh, Bahramipour Isfahani M, Manshaee G.R. Preparing a Healthy Body Image Package and Comparing its Effectiveness with Cash Cognitive-Behavioral Therapy on Beliefs about Appearance, Body Image Quality of Life, Fear of Negative Evaluation, Self-Esteem and Perfectionism of 12 to 15 Years Old Adolescents with Body Image Dissatisfaction. PHD thesis. 2024.[Link]
  22. Lewis-Smith H, Garbett KM, Chaudhry A, Dhillon M, Shroff H, White P, Diedrichs PC. Evaluating a body image school-based intervention in India: A randomized controlled trial. Body Image. 2023;44:148-56. [DOI: 10.1016/j.bodyim.
    2022.12.006]
    [PMID]
  23. Farhazadi M, Madahi MA, Khalatbari J. Comparison of the Effectiveness of Acceptance and Commitment Group Therapy and Cognitive-Behavioral Group Therapy on Dissatisfaction with Body Image and Interpersonal Sensitivity in Women with Body Image Dissatisfaction. Clin Psychol Res Consult. 2017;7(2):69-89. [DOI: 10.22067/ijap.
    v7i2.65791]
  24. Morgan JF, Lazarova S, Schelhase M, Saeidi S. Ten session body image therapy: efficacy of a manualized body image therapy. Eur Eat Disord Rev. 2014;22(4):301-8. [DOI: 10.10
    02/erv.2249 ]
    [PMID]
  25. Yager Z, O’Dea J. A controlled intervention to promote a healthy body image, reduce eating disorder risk and prevent excessive exercise among trainee health education and physical education. teachers. Health Educ Res.2010; 25(5): 841-52. [DOI: 10.1093/her/cyq036] [PMID]

Article Type: Research Article | Subject: Health Education and Promotion
Received: 2024/01/19 | Accepted: 2024/05/21 | Published: 2024/06/21

Add your comments about this article : Your username or Email:
CAPTCHA

Send email to the article author


Rights and permissions
Creative Commons License This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.

© 2025 CC BY 4.0 | Avicenna Journal of Neuro Psycho Physiology

Designed & Developed by : Yektaweb