According to experts, fundamental life skills are assigned to three categories: rational, emotional, and behavioral. Moreover, the education system is responsible for teaching students valuable life skills
[1]; therefore, it is essential to take these life skills into account from experts' perspectives. They believe that such skills as self-awareness, stress management, decision-making, problem-solving, handling negative emotions, and creative thinking are considered interpersonal skills. On the other hand, empathy, anger management, effective communication, and critical thinking fall into intrapersonal skills. Therefore, rational, emotional, and behavioral skills are among the most important life abilities
[2]. Rational skills include self-awareness, as well as critical and creative thinking. Self-awareness helps individuals acquire deeper knowledge about their personality, demands, objectives, weaknesses, strengths, emotions, values, and identity. Gaining knowledge about emotions is recognized as one of the most important parts of self-analysis
[3]. Critical thinking as a rational skill helps individuals find essential evidence for judgment and conclusion; therefore, all trustworthy evidence should be studied without any prejudice or discrimination. As an example, children with this skill would be able to analyze and then reject their friends' irrational suggestions and finally make an emotional-rational decision
[4]. The creative thinking skill broadens the ability to create new thoughts, processes, experiences, and objectives. It helps family members find more effective solutions for their problems; therefore, they could take many steps toward success
[5].
The emotional skill is also recognized as an important life skill consisting of empathy, effective communication, and emotion management. It improves the ability to establish good commu-nication, influence, convince, and resist people
[6]. Communication is regarded as the mere tool to transfer and receive information; that is to say, we could express our emotions through establishing communication with others. For instance, effective communication clears up serious misunderstandings and plays a key role in managing negative emotions
[7]. Empathy is also regarded as a type of life skill that depends on mutual agreement and respect. It occurs when an individual shows unity with others through his/her statements and body language. The main purpose of any communication is the achievement of empathy. Emotion management is known as the ability to handle stress and other emotions to attain life objectives
[8]. Some skills, such as mental health maintenance, purposefulness, decision-making, and problem-solving, are regarded as behavioral skills. Physical and mental health maintenance is among the life skills enabling an individual to move toward mental health and strengthen him/herself against physical and mental problems
[9].
The learning of different thinking and thought management methods is considered an important life skill. Moreover, the effect of human beings' social behavior on their interpersonal and social relations highlights the need for training in rational, emotional, and behavioral life skills. The present research provided an almost accurate knowledge about some training methods concerned with the skills above. It assessed the effect of both rational-emotional theory and strict discipline on the level of these skills.
Objectives
The current study aimed to compare the efficiency of rational-emotional theory and a strict discipline on the rational, emotional, and behavioral skills of second-grade high school students.
Materials and Methods
The current study was conducted based on a pre and post-test design on three groups, including one control and two test groups. The statistical population consisted of 90 male second-grade high school students in Tehran during 2019-2020. The
G*
Power software was used to calculate the sample size. A number of 75 second-grade students were recruited for this study via the convenient sampling method. After that, the participants were assigned to three groups of 25 students, considering the effect size (0.40), confidence level (0.95), test power (0.80), and sample attrition (10%). Non-gifted male students in the second-grade high school without any breaking school discipline history were selected as the sample. Some of them were excluded from the study due to their repeated absence from school or the provision of useless information. The test was carried out through arbitrary participation. Firstly, the participants were provided with the aims and procedure of the study and the voluntary nature of the study and their right to withdraw from the study at any point.
Moreover, members of the control group were allowed to receive the same therapies carried out for the test group after the end of the test if they wished. Access to all documents, questionnaires, and personal records was restricted to the researchers. Written informed consent was obtained from all participants.
Before the research commencement, participants had to take a test on life skills; subsequently, they were randomly assigned to three groups. The first and second experimental groups were trained on rational-emotional theory and strict disciple for eight weekly sessions of 1.5 h. A group consultation was also arranged for the third group (control). The three groups took an exam at the end of the research, and the results were compared. Accordingly, the control variables entailed the field of study, gender, and training district. Such variables as the family's economic and cultural status, parent's employment status, and the number of siblings were not excluded (Tables 1 and 2).
A self-made questionnaire on life skills
The research questionnaire was developed based on Picklesimer and Miller life skill questionnaire. It contains ten sub-scales and 80 items which analyze three rational, emotional, and behavioral components. The items are rated on the Likert scale. The questionnaire evaluates such sub-scales as self-analysis, creative thinking, critical thinking, developing effective communication, empathy, stress management, observing mental and physical health, having a purpose in life, decision-making, and problem-solving. The questionnaire's content validity was evaluated by 15 experts in psychology, reporting the content validity ratio of 0.77. Moreover, in the present research, Cronbach's alpha coefficient and concurrent validity were obtained at 0.95 and 0.79, respectively. The data were analyzed in
SPSS software (version 21) using multi-variant analysis of the covariance and Scheffe's Post Hoc test.
F=2.51), and behavioral (P>0.53, F=3.74) skills.
Multivariate Wilks Lambda test was used to investigate differences among the group regarding rational, emotional, and behavioral components, pointing to a significant difference among rational, emotional, and behavioral skills (P<0.001).
As illustrated in Table 4, Scheffe's Post Hoc test results suggest that the intervention group reported significantly more rational, emotional, and behavioral skills through the use of rational-emotional theory compared to the other two groups (P<0.001). There is no significant difference in the scores of rational, emotional, and behavioral skills among the studied group under strict discipline and control.
Discussion
The current research aimed to compare the effect of the rational-emotional theory and strict discipline on rational, behavioral, and emotional skills among second-grade high school students. Based on the findings, the rational-emotional theory led to an increase in rational skills, such as self-analysis, creative thinking, and critical thinking. The results of the present study are consistent with those reported by Antonio and Crossett. They assessed the effectiveness of the National Curriculum and Training Institute's "Cognitive Life Skills" Program among parolees.
Based on the findings, teaching seven important behavioral habits, including health maintenance, confiding, hearing, supporting, respecting, encouraging, and negotiating with people in the course of consultation sessions, would facilitate communication development. Furthermore, the rational-emotional theory holds people responsible for their actions. Hence, their mental interpretations play a significant role in forming cognitive distortion and their replacement with rational structures. Therefore, an individual gradually learns more proper conduct and expresses much more skills over time. Research findings revealed no significant association
between strict discipline and rational skills among
students
[10].
It means that aggressive behavior, passive conduct or contempt, fear and anxiety, and lying increased following strict discipline. This method is not desirable for students since although learners accept the class rules, they fail to believe in training to the extent that sometimes they show negative reaction towards the tutor's demands, rather than deliberately accepting given recommendations taught in the course of thinking skill sessions. Findings pointed to a significant positive association between rational-emotional theory and emotional skills among students. As a result, strict discipline will encourage apparent cooperation among students, while it fails to lead to empathy and deep emotions. The same is true for the skill utilized to establish effective communication. Students trained using rational-emotional theory could develop effective communication and show better reactions towards people using acquired rational beliefs and stress management.
Nevertheless, strict discipline leads to poor and superficial communications; therefore, students lack strong emotions. Research findings revealed no significant relationship between strict discipline and behavioral skills among students. Therefore, strict discipline fails to internalize behavioral values; that is, students obey rules only in the presence of supervisors
[11,12].
It means that knowledge, thinking, and responsibility acquired from the rational-emotional theory enable the learners to determine their life objectives. Moreover, they would learn problem-solving skills and mental and physical health methods; therefore, students' behavioral and emotional skills obtained by the use of the rational-emotional theory would be more effective than strict discipline. The former's marked effect can be ascribed to the fact that in the rational-emotional theory, the students will understand their fundamental needs and require rational skills to meet them. Furthermore, students accustom themselves to their needs through rational-emotional power and their role in this theory. However, they would also learn skills regarding critical thinking by taking advantage of behavioral components, especially thinking, controlling their action, and responsive thinking. Using a behavioral component, students understand which behaviors to exhibit in specific situations and perceive the notion of the desired world, leading to improvements in their creative thinking. Therefore, this training would significantly improve students' rational skills.
Conclusions
As evidenced by the obtained results, training students on life skills through a rational-emotional theory can increase students' rational, behavioral, and emotional skills. Nevertheless, the strict discipline method revealed no significant relationship between training students on life skills and increased rational, behavioral, and emotional skills.
Compliance with ethical guidelines
All ethical principles were adhered to in the present research. The participants were informed about the aims and procedure of the research. Written informed consent was obtained from the subjects. They were also assured of the confidentiality of their information. Moreover, the subjects could withdraw from the study if desired. They were also informed that they would be provided with the results of the research.
Acknowledgments
We would like to thank our participants, who greatly cooperated with us in the research.
AuthorsΚΌ contributions
Conceptualization [Abbas Almasi]; Methodology [Hasan Asadzadeh Dahraei]; Investigation [Faezeh Jahan]; Writing – Original Draft [Ameneh Moazedian]; Writing – Review & Editing, Author names [all author]; Funding Acquisition, [all author]; Resources, [all author]; Supervision, [Hasan Asadzadeh Dahraei].
Funding/Support
This research did not receive any specific grant from funding agencies in the public, commercial, or not-for-profit sectors.
Conflicts of Interest
The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.
References
- Wang X. Why students choose STEM majors: Motivation, high school learning, and postsecondary context of support. American Educational Research Journal. 2013; 50(5):1081-121. [DOI:10.3102/0002831213488622]
- Cerezo R, Bogarín A, Esteban M, Romero C. Process mining for self-regulated learning assessment in e-learning. Journal of Computing in Higher Education. 2019; 32(1):74-88. [DOI:10.1007/s12528-019-09225-y]
- Hinduja S, Patchin JW. Social influences on cyberbullying behaviors among middle and high school students.
Journal of Youth and Adolescence. 2013; 42(5):711-22. [DOI:10.1007/s10964-012-9902-4] [PMID]
- Bøe T, Sivertsen B, Heiervang E, Goodman R, Lundervold AJ, Hysing M. Socioeconomic status and child mental health: The role of parental emotional well-being
and parenting practices. Journal of Abnormal Child Psychology. 2014; 42(5):705-15. [DOI:10.1007/s10802-013-9818-9] [PMID]
- Wang MT, Brinkworth M, Eccles J. Moderating effects of teacher–student relationship in adolescent trajectories of emotional and behavioral adjustment. Developmental Psychology. 2013; 49(4):690-705. [DOI:10.1037/a0027916] [PMID]
- Greenberg MT, Domitrovich CE, Weissberg RP, Durlak JA. Social and emotional learning as a public health approach to education. The Future of Children. 2017; 2(4):13-32. [DOI:10.1353/foc.2017.000]
- Hagen I, Nayar US. Yoga for children and young people's mental health and well-being: research review and reflections on the mental health potentials of yoga. Frontiers in Psychiatry. 2014; 2(5):35-44. [DOI:10.3389/fpsyt.
2014.00035] [PMID] [PMCID]
- Schonert-Reichl KA, Oberle E, Lawlor MS, Abbott D, Thomson K, Oberlander TF, et al. Enhancing cognitive and social–emotional development through a simple-to-administer mindfulness-based school program for elementary school children: a randomized controlled trial. Developmental Psychology. 2015; 51(1):52-61. [DOI:10.1037/a0038454] [PMID] [PMCID]
- Gregory A, Allen JP, Mikami AY, Hafen CA, Piata RC. Effects of a professional development program on behavioral engagement of students in middle and high school. Psychology in the Schools. 2014; 51(2):143-63. [DOI: 10.1002/pits.21741] [PMID] [PMCID]
- Eggenberger E, Heimerl K, Bennett MI. Communication skills training in dementia care: a systematic review of effectiveness, training content, and didactic methods in different care settings. International Psychogeriatrics. 2013; 25(3):345-58. [DOI:10.1017/S1041610212001664] [PMID]
- August F, Pembe AB, Mpembeni R, Axemo P, Darj E. Effectiveness of the home based life saving skills training by community health workers on knowledge of danger signs, birth preparedness, complication readiness and facility delivery, among women in Rural Tanzania. BMC Pregnancy and Childbirth. 2016; 16(1):129. [DOI:10.1186/s12884-016-0916-x] [PMID] [PMCID]
- Singla DR, Waqas A, Hamdani SU, Suleman N, Zafar SW, Saeed K, et al. Implementation and effectiveness of adolescent life skills programs in low-and middle-income countries: a critical review and meta-analysis. Behaviour Research and Therapy. 2020; 130:103402. [DOI:10.1016/j.
brat.2019.04.010] [PMID]