Hashemi-Firouzi N, Akhavan M, Komaki A, Shahidi S. Effects of Acute Administration of Urtica dioica on the Novel Object-Recognition Task in Mice. Avicenna J Neuro Psycho Physiology 2015; 2 (3) :79-82
URL:
http://ajnpp.umsha.ac.ir/article-1-59-en.html
1- Neurophysiology Research Center, Hamadan University of Medical Sciences, Hamadan, IR Iran 2- Neurophysiology Research Center, Hamadan University of Medical Sciences, Hamadan, IR Iran , siamakshahidi@yahoo.com
Abstract: (1820 Views)
Background: Urtica dioica (nettle) has a variety of uses in traditional medicine for the treatment of certain urogenital problems, gastrointestinal disorders, and diabetes.
Objectives: Recent studies have implicated the effect of U. dioica on brain functions such as pain and memory. However, there is no direct evidence of the acute effects of this plant on cognition. The aim of the present study was to evaluate the effect of U. dioica aqueous extract on the novel object-recognition task (NOR) in mice.
Materials and Methods: First, U. dioica aqueous extract was prepared, then adult male mice were randomly divided into four experimental groups. During the training session, the mice were placed in a box and given 5 minutes to explore two identical objects. The next day, they were again placed in the box and allowed to explore one familiar and one novel object. They received intraperitoneal injections of saline or U. dioica aqueous extract (100 mg/kg) before or immediately after the training session or before the test session of the NOR task.
Results: The results showed that there was a preference for the novel object compared to the familiar one in each of the experimental groups. The object-recognition discrimination index in the group of mice that received U. dioica before training was significantly less than in the other experimental groups. There was no significant difference in the discrimination index between the other groups. U. dioica did not decrease the time spent exploring familiar and unfamiliar objects, or the total time spent exploring both objects.
Conclusions: Acute administration of U. dioica impairs the object-recognition task if it is used only before the training session. This may be due to its modulation on the acquisition processing of object-recognition. U. dioica has no significant effects on the consolidation or retrieval processing stages of the NOR task. These results emphasize the unfavorable effect on cognitive function of pre-training with acute supplementation of U. dioica .
Article Type:
Research Article |
Subject:
Special Received: 2015/06/1 | Accepted: 2015/08/15 | Published: 2015/08/29