1. Introduction
Ego-defense mechanisms are known as automated ordering processes that act to reduce cognitive abnormal and contort perceptions of threatening events, trying to downgrade abrupt changes in the internal and external reality. Subjectively and objectively, defense mechanisms are divided into different groups that are related to the level of defense action. The efforts of defense mechanisms to reduce inhibiting thoughts or, at least, prevent them from stabilization of attributes and habits lead to the formation of personality [
1].
The defense mechanisms are adjusted in terms of their relationship with psychosocial maturity and psychological harm in a hierarchical order. The defense mechanisms which are responsible for protecting people may be usual or unusual, efficient or useless [
2]. In this regard, Andrews et al. reported 20 defense mechanisms [
3]. In the psychoanalytic system, each mental disturbance is related with certain incompatible defensive mechanisms which play a key role in psychological health. Several studies have supported this assumption, and research has shown that the mental and physical health of the people is related to their defense mechanisms [
4,
5].
According to Young, however, those who have pre-existing maladaptive beliefs, show maladaptive strategies that may make their schemas permanent and irrevocable. Early maladaptive schemas are emotional and cognitive patterns which are formed since childhood and duplicated across life. They may be composed of emotional memories of pain, tragedies, fear, abuse, neglect, safety needs, abandonment, or lack of normal human affection in general. Early maladaptive schemas can also include bodily sensations related to such emotional memories. Early Maladaptive Schema (EMS) can be classified in different ways. Young and colleagues classified 18 EMS in two great subcategories and further into five areas. According to Young and colleagues, the exact number of EMS is not constant [
6]. Another variable that is directly related to EMS is alexithymia.
Alexithymia is the inability to cognitively process of emotional information and emotion regulation. Individuals with alexithymia magnify normal body massages, misinterpreting physical symptoms of emotional arousal, expressing emotional distress through physical complaints, and seeking therapies for symptom relief. Therefore, alexithymia as a multifaceted structure is characterized by the difficulty in identifying emotions, describing emotions, and objective thinking [
2]. Several studies have been conducted on the field of early maladaptive schemas, defensive mechanisms, and alexithymia, including the following research studies.
Zadmohsen and Seraj Khorrami investigated the relationship between body image worries, early maladaptive schemas, and alexithymia with social anxiety among female students of Islamic Azad University. Their findings showed a relationship between body image worries, early maladaptive schemas, and alexithymia with social anxiety. Also, regression analysis showed that body image worries, early maladaptive schemas, and alexithymia could predict social anxiety [
7].
Hemmati-Sabet et al. studied the effectiveness of schema therapy in reducing aggression and social anxiety in boys aged 17-18 years old in Hamadan. The results showed that schema therapy was effective in reducing aggression and social anxiety in adolescents aged 17-18 years old in Hamedan [
8]. Farzaneh et al. conducted a study on the relationship between early maladaptive schemes, emotions, and alexithymia with drug addiction. Their findings indicated a relationship between EMS, feelings, and alexithymia with drug addiction prevalence (P<0.01). Also, there was a significant relationship between early maladaptive schemes and the readiness for addiction (P<0.01). [
9].
Ghadiri Sourman Abadi and colleagues investigated the relationship between emotional alexithymia and maladaptive schemas among Tabriz University students. The results showed a significant positive relationship between emotional alexithymia and EMS and excessive hearing loss. Also, the regression analysis showed that self-regulation and overlapping areas of activity were emotional predictors [
10]. Regarding what was discussed, this study aims to determine the relationship between EMS with alexithymia and ego-defensive styles among the students of Azad and Payame Noor universities in Shahindej City, Iran.
2. Materials and Methods
Research design and sampling method
This was a correlational study and was conducted on students of Azad and Payame Noor universities in Shahindej City, West Azerbaijan Province, Iran in 2017. The multi-stage cluster sampling method was used for choosing study samples from the two universities proportional to the number of students in each university. The study sample size was recruited from 1500 students during one semester considering the inclusion and exclusion criteria.
Study tools
The demographic information questionnaire, standard ego defense styles questionnaire, Toronto Aexithymia Scale (TAS-20), and early maladaptive schemas of Young (short form) were used to collect information. Ego defense styles questionnaire was designed by Andrews et al. [
11]. This scale has 40 items. It examines 20 defense mechanisms in three levels of immature, mature, and neurotic styles [
3]. This questionnaire was also examined and standardized by Heidari Nasab [
12] in Iran. The reliability and validity of the questionnaire were also evaluated based on the correlation of each statement with a related mechanism. The reliability of this scale for the whole questionnaire was 0.84 [
12]. In this research, its reliability was found 0.78 based on the Cronbach alpha value.
Toronto Aexithymia Scale (TAS-20) was developed by Taylor in 1986, and revised in 1994 by Bagby, Parker, and Taylor [
12]. This scale consists of 20 items in three subscales of difficulty in recognizing emotions (7 items), difficulty in describing emotions (5 items), and objective thinking (8 items). Ghorbani et al. calculated the alpha values of this scale in an Iranian sample as 0.44 for the difficulty in detecting emotions, 0.61 for the difficulty in describing emotions, and 0.50 for objective thinking. In this study, the reliability was found 0.81 by using the Cronbach alpha value. Early Maladaptive Schemas Young's Inventory (short form) was developed by Young et al. [
13]. The short form of the questionnaire has 75 items that measure 15 early maladaptive schemas. In this research, the reliability was found 0.84 using the Cronbach alpha coefficient.
Study analysis
The collected data were analyzed with descriptive statistics and the Pearson correlation coefficients in SPSS 20.
3. Results
According to the cluster sampling method, 306 students were selected as the statistical sample. The demographic features of the students are presented in Table 1. As shown in Table 2, the mean values for maladaptive components are as follows: emotional deprivation; 16.73, abandonment/instability; 14.85, mistrust/abuse; 15.76, isolation/alienation; 13.32, defectiveness/shame; 15.81, failure; 9.48, dependence/incompetence; 11.03, vulnerability to harm or illness; 16.3, enmeshment/undeveloped self; 14.94, subjugation; 18.99, self-sacrifice; 15.64, emotional inhibition; 15.91, unrelenting standards; 14.70, approval-seeking/recognition-seeking; 13.92, and insufficient self-control and/or self-discipline; 11.77. As shown in Table 2, the mean scores were 16.54 in mature, 54.62 in immature, and 29.49 in neurotic types. As shown in Table 3, the mean value for difficulty in recognizing emotions was 19.96, for difficulty in describing feelings was 17.66 and for objective thinking was 23.14 (Table 4).
Hypotheses
1. There is a positive relationship between early maladaptive schemas and the alexithymia among the university students. As the significance level is less than 0.05, there is a significant and inverse relationship between the early maladaptive schemas and emotional alexithymia (Table 5).
2. There is a significant relationship between the early maladaptive schemas with ego defensive styles among the university students. According to Table 6, there is a significant and negative relationship between early maladaptive schemas and ego-defensive styles.
3. There is a significant difference between the male and female students regarding early maladaptive schemas, alexithymia, and ego-defensive styles. According to Table 7, the significance level for the difference between male and female students regarding the early maladap
tive schemas was 0.773. Therefore, the early maladaptive schemas of female and male students are the same.
4. There is a significant difference between Azad and Payam Noor university students regarding the early maladaptive schemas, alexithymia, and ego-defensive styles. According to the Table 8, the significance level obtained for the difference between the early maladaptive schemas between students of Azad and Payame Noor universities was 0.018. Therefore, there is a significant difference between the early maladaptive schemas of the students of Azad and Payame Noor universities.
According to the Table 8, the significance level obtained for the difference between the students of Azad and Payame Noor universities regarding the alexithymia was 0.19. Therefore, there is no significant difference between the students' alexithymia of two universities. According to the Table 8, the significance level for the difference between students of Azad and Payame Noor universities regarding ego-defensive styles was 0.024, which is less than 0.05. Therefore, there is a significant difference between the students of Azad and Payame Noor universities regarding ego-defensive styles.