Diabetes is a chronic metabolic disease and is characterized by insulin resistance and loss of pancreatic β-cell function
[1, 2]. Hyperglycemia is one of the central factors for the development of oxidative stress that induces important complications in diabetic patients
[3]. These complications typically include microvascular (retinopathy, neuropathy, and nephropathy) and macrovascular (cardiovascular and cerebrovascular) diseases
[4].
Diabetes affects the central nervous system (CNS) associated with cognition, especially memory and learning; moreover, it increases the risk of developing dementia by up to 60%
[5]. Hyperglycemia enhances the formation of reactive oxygen species (ROS) through glucose autoxidation, polyol pathways, and non-enzymatic glycation of proteins. These free radicals can have significant effects on carbohydrates, proteins, and DNA
[6]. The hippocampus is a part of the limbic system of the brain, and it is the consolidation center for cognitive functions, such as memory and learning that are affected in diabetes
[7]. The gut-brain axis (GBA) has been introduced as a novel therapeutic target in neurological disorders and other diseases that function through glucagon-like peptide-1(GLP-1)
[8]. Additionally, GLP-1 and its analogs can cross the blood-brain barrier and improve memory and learning
[9].
Studies have indicated that probiotics can suppress the production of oxidative stress by increasing the levels of antioxidant enzymes, such as
superoxide dismutase (SOD) and
glutathione peroxidase
(GPx)
[10,11]. Previous studies also revealed that probiotics were beneficial for brain function and had therapeutic effects for various CNS disorders
[12]. Another way to treat metabolic disorders is the use of natural compounds rich in phenols and flavonoids
[13-16]. Resveratrol is a polyphenol that can cross the blood-brain barrier in the areas of the brain that are involved in learning and memory
and may be involved in modulating message transmission in CNS
[17]. Consequently, it has been suggested as a potential compound in the treatment of diabetes and neurodegenerative disorders
[18]. Probably, the concurrent administration of these compounds can have potent neuroprotective effects.
Objectives
The present study aimed to investigate the therapeutic effects of probiotics and resveratrol combination on oxidative stress, memory, learning, as well as GLP-1 levels in Streptozotocin (STZ) induced diabetic rats.
Materials and Methods
Animals
This experimental study was conducted on 30 healthy 8-week-old Wistar rats (weight range: 250-300) that were purchased from Hamadan University of Medical Sciences, Hamadan, Iran. The rats were kept under a conditioner at 50%-60% humidity and a controlled temperature of 22±2°C within the animal room under a 12:12-h light/dark cycle. Subsequently, the rats were randomly divided into five groups of six animals per group and kept in separate cages. The experimental groups included: 1) control rats, 2) diabetic rats, 3) diabetic rats receiving probiotic supplements (50×10
9CFU/kg), 4) diabetic rats receiving resveratrol (10 mg/kg), and 5) diabetic rats receiving the combined probiotic and resveratrol supplements.
Induction of Type 2 diabetes
To induce type 2 diabetes, single doses of STZ (65 mg/kg) (Sigma-Aldrich, USA) and nicotinamide (110 mg/kg) were administered intraperitoneally (dissolved in 0.1 M citrate buffer, pH=4.5)[3]. Furthermore, blood glucose levels were measured by glucometer seven days after STZ injection and regarded as type 2 diabetes if their blood glucose was above 250mg/dl.
Animal treatments
Probiotics contain lyophilized bacteria, including eight different strains (
Bifidobacterium longum, Bifidobacterium breve, Bifidobacterium infantis, Lactobacillus acidophilus, Lactobacillus plantarum, Lactobacillus casei, and
Lactobacillus bulgaricus) with a dose of 50×109CFU/kg in drinking water for four weeks according to previously published studies
[3]. Totally, 10 mg/kg of resveratrol powder was daily mixed in 1ml sterile distilled water per rat and maintained on ice until complete gavage
[19]. The animals received probiotics and resveratrol once a day for four weeks. It should be noted that the behavioral tests were performed at the end of the treatment. Furthermore, the probiotics and resveratrol were purchased from Genuine Health (Canada) and Natural Fact Companies (USA), respectively.
Behavioral tests
Evaluation of passive avoidance learning
The passive avoidance learning (PAL) test was performed at the end of the experiment using a Shuttle Box. This plexiglass box is divided into both dark and light compartments with a dimension
of 30×20×30 cm. The two compartments are interconnected by a single (20×50 cm) valve connected by a guillotine door. In total, three mm metal bars with a distance of 10 mm were installed on the floor of the plexiglass box. A dark chamber was considered during testing, and the guillotine door was closed between the two compartments during the training. When the rat was placed in the light compartment, the guillotine door was opened, and the delay time was measured by a chronometer. After the entrance of the rat to the dark compartment, the guillotine door was closed, and an electric shock was applied to the animals during the training phase through bars attached to the stimulator device. At this stage, the rats were placed in the light part to be acquainted with the device, and after 30 sec, the door was opened between the two parts. After the rat entered the dark area, the door was closed and after 30 sec, the animal was taken out and returned to the cage. Subsequently, these steps were repeated after 30 min, and following the second stage, the rat was placed in a bright environment for 30 sec, and then the guillotine door was opened between the two parts. The delayed entry time (step-through latency) (STLa) was recorded for each rat at that stage. After the rat had fully entered the dark chamber, the guillotine door was closed, and an electric shock was applied through the metal rods of the chamber floor for a second. The animal was then removed from the dark chamber after 30 sec and returned to the cage. This step was repeated after 2 min, and the retention test was performed according to a previously conducted study
[20]. The rats were placed in a light chamber (the same as PAL training), and 5 sec later, the guillotine door was opened, and the STLa in the retention trial (STLr), as well as the time spent in dark compartment (TDC), were recorded for up to 300 sec. If the rat did not enter the dark chamber within 300 sec, the retention test was terminated and a ceiling score of 300 s was assigned.
Tissue measurement of GLP-1
The ELISA Kit was used to determine the GLP-1 levels according to the manufacturer’s instructions (ZellBio, Germany).
Determination of total antioxidant capacity, total oxidative status, and malondialdehyde
Total antioxidant capacity (TAC) was determined by ferric-reducing antioxidant power assay
[21,22]. Furthermore, the
total oxidative status (TOS) of the sample was determined by the oxidation of ferrous iron to ferric in the samples with moderate acidity
[21,22]. Malondialdehyde (MDA) level was measured according to the manufacturer’s instructions (ZellBio, Germany)
[21,22].
Measurement of antioxidant enzyme activity
The activity of catalase (CAT), SOD, and GPX enzymes was measured using a kit (ZellBio, Germany).
Histology of hippocampus
Hippocampus were fixed in 4% formaldehyde, immersed in paraffin, and then stained with hematoxylin and eosin according to previously conducted studies
[23,24].
Statistical analysis
The results were analyzed using SPSS software (version 20) through ANOVA and Tukey's post hoc test in case of significant results. A p-value less than 0.05 (P<0.05) was considered statistically significant.
Results
Findings of passive avoidance memory test using the Shuttle Box test
The result showed no significant difference among the animals regarding the latency to enter the dark box during the adaptation phase (Figure 1).
Comparison of the time of "first dark entry" in the step-through latency in the retention test
A significant decrease was observed in the time of "first dark entry" in the avoidance memory test in the diabetic group, compared to the control group (P<0.001). Moreover, the time of "first dark entry" in the probiotics alone and resveratrol alone
groups indicated a significant increase (P<0.01). Furthermore, a comparison of the diabetic with the diabetic group treated with probiotics and resveratrol indicated a significant decrease in this regard (P<0.001) (Figure 1).
Comparison of the duration of stay in the dark room of the Shuttle Box
After comparing the duration of stay in the dark room of the Shuttle Box in the avoidance memory test, the results indicated a significant decrease in the control group, compared to the diabetic group (P<0.001). Furthermore, the duration of stay in the dark room of the Shuttle Box in probiotics alone and resveratrol alone groups indicated a significant decrease in this regard (P<0.01). In addition, the combined probiotics and resveratrol group, compared to the diabetic group, showed a significant decrease in dark room stay (P<0.001) (Figure 1).
Effect of treatment with probiotics and resveratrol on malondialdehyde concentration
The level of MDA was significantly higher in the diabetic group, compared to the control group (P=0.0034). Moreover, the level of MDA was significantly decreased in the probiotic-treated diabetic group, compared to the diabetic group (39% decrease) (P=0.093). However, there was no
significant decrease in the resveratrol-treated diabetic group, compared to the diabetic group. On the other hand, there was a significant decrease in the diabetic group treated with resveratrol and probiotics, compared to the diabetic group (44% decrease) (P=0.0185)
(Figure 2).
Effect of treatment with probiotics and resveratrol on total oxidative status
The level of TOS as a marker of oxidant showed a remarkable increase in the diabetic group, compared to the control group (P=0.0036). The level of TOS was significantly decreased in the resveratrol-treated diabetic group, compared to the diabetic group (45% decrease; P=0.0062). Combined probiotics and resveratrol treatment reduced the level of TOS significantly (52% decrease; P=0.0015), which indicated the effect of oxidant decrease in response to combined therapies (Figure 2).
Effect of treatment with probiotics and resveratrol on total antioxidant capacity
The level of TAC was significantly (P=0.0192) lower in the diabetic group, compared to the control group. Moreover, the increase in the level of TAC was not significant in the diabetic group receiving resveratrol alone and probiotics alone; however, the combined probiotics and resveratrol treatment increased TAC significantly (105% increase; P=0.04) (Figure 2).
Effect of treatment with probiotics and resveratrol on superoxide dismutase, activity of catalase, and glutathione peroxidase activity
The level of SOD activity significantly reduced in response to the combined probiotics and resveratrol treatment (47% decrease; P <0.001). The level of enzyme activity in the combined probiotics and resveratrol treatment group was similar to that of the control group, indicating that this combination therapy was effective (Figure 3). The decrease in CAT enzyme activity was significant in the combined treatment group (45% decrease; P=0.01). Furthermore, the level of enzyme activity in the combined probiotics and resveratrol treatment group was similar to that of the control group, indicating the positive effect of the combined treatment (Figure 3). Furthermore, the combined