Volume 7, Issue 4 (November 2020)                   Avicenna J Neuro Psycho Physiology 2020, 7(4): 225-230 | Back to browse issues page

XML Print

Download citation:
BibTeX | RIS | EndNote | Medlars | ProCite | Reference Manager | RefWorks
Send citation to:

Mokhtarinejad O, Mirzaian B, Hassanzadeh R. Effectiveness of Schema Therapy and Acceptance and Commitment Therapy in Components of Cognitive Emotion Regulation among Patients with Anxiety Disorder. Avicenna J Neuro Psycho Physiology 2020; 7 (4) :225-230
URL: http://ajnpp.umsha.ac.ir/article-1-262-en.html
1- PhD Student of General Psychology, Sari Branch, Islamic Azad University, Sari, Iran
2- Assistant Professor, Department of Psychology, Sari Branch, Islamic Azad University, Sari, Iran , Bahrammirzaian@gmail.com
3- Professor, Department of Psychology, Sari Branch, Islamic Azad University, Sari, Iran
Full-Text [PDF 1530 kb]   (776 Downloads)     |   Abstract (HTML)  (2126 Views)
Full-Text:   (830 Views)
Today, one of the most critical aspects of mental health is anxiety. Anxiety disorders are currently most prevalent in the category of mental disorders within a prevalence of 8.8-29% during life [1]. One of the types of anxiety disorders is health anxiety. Health anxiety is defined as a wide range of concerns that individuals may have about their health [2] and often experienced by patients under primary care [3]. Health anxiety is a broad cognitive disorder that is formed as a misconception about the symptoms and physical changes resulting from an individual's beliefs about illness or health [4]
Anxiety is a continuum of health, and mild anxiety is related to physical feelings. On the other hand, intense fears are associated with health and mental obsession with physical feelings [5]. Emotional mental images often reinforce these thoughts leading to the experience of severe health anxiety. Individuals experiencing severe health anxiety have diagnostic criteria for anxiety disorder based on the Fifth Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders [6]
Cognitive studies suggest that individuals with an anxiety disorder are more likely to interpret physical symptoms as health weakness or serious illness than nonsufferers [7]. They are more likely to believe that they are weak and unable to cope with stress. These individuals are more inclined to overestimate the possibility of getting a disease. They may have extensive knowledge only in the field of disease and not in other fields [8]. On the other hand, the methods of dealing with such stress, psychological anxieties, and work problems can to some extent facilitate the psychological condition of the workplace [9]. Researchers believe that the way a person evaluates cognition in case of dealing with an adverse event is very important. Individuas' mental health stems from a two-way interaction between the use of certain types of cognitive emotion regulation strategies and correct assessment of stressful situations [10]
The general concept of cognitive emotion regulation refers to the cognitive model of manipulating the entry of emotion-calling information [11]. In other words, cognitive emotion regulation strategies refer to the way individuals think after experiencing a negative incident or traumatic event [12]. It also shows that when individuals are psychologically distressed, they have difficulty coping with stressful situations in life. Difficulty in the regulation of emotions means that it is hard or impossible to deal with or experience emotions. Difficulty in regulating emotions can manifest itself in the form of excessive aggravation or inactivation of emotions and causes individuals to experience ineffective methods, such as rumination, anxiety, overeating, or alcohol abuse, when faced with excitement [13]
In addition, in a study carried out by Jafari Nodoshan et al. [14], it was observed that divorced women with distressing experiences are at lower levels of emotion, adaptability, and mental health than married women without these experiences. It can be said that divorced women face many psychological, social, and emotional problems and harms. Furthermore, the combination of these pressures causes tension in various dimensions and makes it difficult to regulate their excitement [15]
Schema therapy is an innovative and integrated method developed by Yang et al. [16]. In the context of psychotherapy, a schema is considered an organizational factor that is essential for the perception of an individual's life experiences [17]. Among individuals with low levels of perceived fear, negative life changes have minimal effect on the pattern of subsequent negative emotional experiences. This condition has been explained among those with high levels of perceived fear through pessimistic cognitive assessment, which is useful in the exacerbation of subsequent negative emotions [18]
Another treatment that is effective in various studies is acceptance-based therapy. Acceptance and commitment therapy (ACT) is a new form of behavioral therapy based on the theory of relational framework [19]. This approach emphasizes the acceptance and desire to experience internal events in comparison to cognitive behavioral therapy. The ACT assumes that humans find many of their inner feelings, emotions, or thoughts annoying and are continually trying to change or get rid of these inner experiences [20-21]
Based on the evidence, there have been data in this regard to compare the efficacy of schema therapy and ACT to cognitive emotion regulation in patients with an anxiety disorder. 
This study aimed to  compared the effectiveness of schema therapy and ACT in the components of cognitive emotion regulation among patients with an anxiety disorder for the identification of an effective treatment for each of the variables and provision of practical strategies to improve symptoms.
Materials and Methods
This quasi-experimental study was carried out with a three-group pretest-posttest design. The study population included individuals referring to Bavar and Bamdad counseling centers located in Sari, Iran, in 2019. The subjects were assigned to two experimental groups (receiving schema therapy and ACT) and a control group (on the waiting list) after clinical interviews and diagnosis of anxiety disorder. The subjects attended twelve 90-minute sessions of schema therapy (Young, 1990) and eight 90-minute sessions of ACT (Band and Hayes, 2004). At the end of the training course, all the three groups were retested. 
The sample size of this study was 15 subjects in each group according to the voluntary sampling method. The sampling method in this study was nonrandom sampling (i.e., targeted and voluntary sampling). Moreover, the present study was approved by the Ethics Committee of Sari Branch, Islamic Azad University, Sari, Iran, with the ethics code of IR.IAU.SARI.REC.1398.080. 
The inclusion criteria of the current study sample were a diagnosis of anxiety disorder, age range of 25-50 years, no history of neuroleptics during the last trimester, no history of incurable physical diseases (e.g., cancer, multiple sclerosis, and Alzheimer's disease), no severe psychiatric illness (e.g., psychotic or similar), completed conscious consent to participate in the study, and not treated or undergone other psychological interventions during the study. The exclusion criteria was the absence of more than two sessions in the treatment course. In the present study, in order to observe professional ethics, the code of ethics was obtained from the Ethics Committee of Sari Branch, Islamic Azad University.
Emotional Cognitive Regulation Questionnaire (Garnefsky and Craig, 2006)
This is an 18-item measurement tool for cognitive emotion regulation strategies in response to life-threatening and stressful events based on a 5-point Likert scale from 1 (never) to 5 (always) regarding nine scales of self-assessment, focus on catastrophe, positive refocus, positive re-evaluation, acceptance, and refocus on planning. The minimum and maximum scores in each subscale are considered 2 and 10, respectively, and a higher score indicates an individual with higher use of that cognitive strategy [22]. Cognitive emotion adjustment strategies in the Emotional Cognitive Regulation Questionnaire are divided into two general categories of adaptive (i.e., compromised) and nonadaptive (i.e., uncom-promising) strategies. Significant subscales are regarded as positive refocus, positive re-evaluation, acceptance, and refocus on planning.
The data were analyzed through descriptive statistical methods, such as mean and standard deviation, and inferential statistics, including multivariate analysis of covariance and SPSS software (version 22). The Shapiro-Wilk test was used to test the assumption that the covariance test was normal, and the Levene’s test was utilized to investigate the homogeneity of the variances. In addition, the significance level was considered 0.05.
Out of 45 subjects in this study, 6 and 39 participants were male and female, respectively. In addition, 7, 25, 11, and 2 individuals were reported with a diploma, bachelor's degrees, master's degrees, and PhD, respectively. Moreover, 30 and 15 subjects were employed and unemployed, respectively. The average age of the study participants was 35 years (Table 1).
The results of the Levene's test and Box test to test the similar assumption of group variances (P>0.05) and homogeneity of the covariates (P>0.05), respectively, indicated that the default validation for variance analysis was multivariate. The results of the analysis of variance demonstrated that the difference in the components of cognitive emotion regulation after therapeutic interventions was significant among the three groups (F=18.50; P<0.0001). 
Table 2 tabulates that ACT is more effective than schema therapy in the reduction of blaming others
Table 1. Mean and standard deviation of cognitive emotion regulation components in two experimental and control groups in pretest and posttest
Indicator variable
Schema therapy ACT Control
Mean SD Mean SD Mean SD
Blaming others Pretest 11.87 3.20 12.47 2.72 11.33 2.49
Posttest 11.07 2.89 9.27 1.38 11.53 2.87
Focus on catastrophe Pretest 13.20 2.78 13.00 2.72 11.87 3.11
Posttest 11.07 1.75 9.67 1.39 11.93 2.86
Vision disclosure Pretest 12.33 2.66 11.87 2.32 10.93 2.40
Posttest 11.20 2.56 11.40 1.76 10.87 2.29
Positive assessment Pretest 12.13 2.72 11.47 2.94 11.60 2.13
Posttest 13.33 2.19 13.33 1.79 11.87 2.06
Refocus on planning Pretest 11.87 2.32 12.00 3.18 11.40 2.69
Posttest 13.87 1.35 14.73 1.33 11.27 2.86
Positive refocus Pretest 12.07 1.79 11.20 2.39 12.47 1.88
Posttest 14.20 0.94 15.13 1.35 12.80 1.89
Rumination Pretest 12.53 2.61 13.65 2.35 11.73 2.73
Posttest 9.67 1.58 9.20 1.56 12.60 2.82
Acceptance Pretest 11.80 2.75 11.87 2.50 11.53 2.23
Posttest 11.40 2.50 10.80 1.93 12.07 2.78
Self-blame Pretest 11.13 2.06 11.53 2.69 11.13 1.99
Posttest 9.67 1.13 9.33 1.04 11.00 0.36
ACT: Acceptance and commitment therapy
SD: Standard deviation

Table 2. Posttest results of Fisher's LSD
Component Group Mean difference SD P-value
Blaming others Schema therapy ACT 1.999* 0.462 0.0001
Control -0.756 0.471 0.118
ACT Control -2.755* 0.510 0.0001
Focus on catastrophe Schema therapy ACT 1.397* 0.512 0.010
Control -1.299* 0.522 0.018
ACT Control -2.696* 0.565 0.0001
Vision disclosure Schema therapy ACT -0.657 0.492 0.191
Control -0.815 0.503 0.115
ACT Control -0.158 0.543 0.774
Positive assessment Schema therapy ACT -0.135 0.404 0.741
Control 1.399* 0.412 0.002
ACT Control 1.534* 0.446 0.002
Refocus on planning Schema therapy ACT -0.468 0.445 0.300
Control 2.773* 0.454 0.0001
ACT Control 3.241* 0.491 0.0001
Positive refocus Schema therapy ACT -1.189* 0.448 0.012
Control 1.983* 0.457 0.0001
ACT Control 3.172* 0.494 0.0001
Table 1. Continued
Rumination Schema therapy ACT 0.570 0.576 0.329
Control -3.898* 0.587 0.0001
ACT Control -4.468* 0.635 0.0001
Acceptance Schema therapy ACT 0.749 0.544 0.178
Control -0.682 0.556 0.228
ACT Control -1.431* 0.600 0.023
Self-blame Schema therapy ACT 0.864 0.425 0.050
Control -0.705 0.434 0.114
ACT Control -1.569* 0.469 0.002
ACT: Acceptance and commitment therapy
SD: Standard deviation

(P<0.0001) and focus on catastrophe (P<0.010) and increase of positive refocus (P<0.012). There was no significant difference in other emotional regulation components between the groups (P>0.05).
The present study aimed to evaluate the effectiveness of schema therapy and ACT in the components of cognitive emotion regulation in patients with an anxiety disorder. The obtained results showed that both treatments had a significant effect on the components of cognitive emotion regulation. However, no significant difference was observed in terms of the effectiveness of the two treatments. However, the results of the present study can be nearly consistent with the findings of studies examining schema therapy or ACT with the variables, such as anxiety, depression, or cognitive beliefs. Therefore, the obtained results of the present study are in line with the findings of a study by Morvaridi et al. [23].
In explaining the obtained findings, it can be stated that the average scores of the components of cognitive regulation of pretest and posttest excitement were significantly different among the three studied groups; consequently, the performed intervention was effective. Grads and Barsky observed that more than 9% of patients admitted to medical centers experienced anxiety, with a reported prevalence of higher than 5% in the general population. In the aforementioned study, it was shown that individuals with an anxiety disorder try to be alert and sensitive to physical changes [24].
When an individual deliberately pays close attention to his/her body, his/her perception and emotions increase and many emotions, such as itching, coughing, or yawning, have a sickly distinction that can be made by the individual attracting the attention and reactions of others. Furthermore, Thomas et al. showed that individuals with an anxiety disorder were more likely to interpret physical symptoms as health weakness or serious illness and believe them than those with a nonanxiety disorder. They are weak and unable to cope with stress and more inclined to overestimate the possibility of getting the disease. Individuals with an anxiety disorder may have extensive knowledge only in the field of a disease and not in other fields [24].
The results of the present study also confirmed the effect of schema therapy on the components of cognitive emotion regulation in patients with an anxiety disorder. In explaining this finding based on the schema therapy approach, it can be said that changing the initial maladaptive schemas following schema therapy changes the lifestyle, attitudes, and behaviors related to a healthy lifestyle in patients. In this regard, psychological schemas are useful in dealing with individuals in unexpected situations [19]. In explaining this finding based on the positivist psychology approach, it can be said that executive function training is possibly effective since the planning and purposefulness of which lead to the pursuit of goals and success in performance; this in turn by reducing perceived fear has a positive effect on hope [25].
Another result confirmed in the present study was the effect of ACT on the components of cognitive emotion regulation in patients with an anxiety disorder. In explaining this finding, it can be said that the experimental techniques of ACT allow patients to take a more efficient approach to the concerns related to the disease by stopping intellectual rumination associated with excessive reassurance and repeated check-ups. This makes individuals have a more realistic perception of the symptoms of the disease [26].
In addition, the results of the present study are consistent with the findings of a study by Shahsavani et al. [27]. Performance in dealing with hazardous problems ultimately increases the cognitive regulation of emotions [27]. Moreover, establishing good patterns of commitment to the above-mentioned values will create more psychological flexibility in the individual. With this description, it can be said that schema therapy and ACT are effective strategies in the psychological interventions of patients with an anxiety disorder.
Considering the role of beliefs and thoughts in the anxiety disorder, it is suggested that therapists consider schema therapy and ACT in psychological interventions, including cognitive emotion regulation, in this group of patients.
Compliance with ethical guidelines
All the ethical principles were considered in the present study. The participants were informed about the purpose of the study and implementation of stages. In addition, informed consent was obtained from all the study subjects. The participants were also assured of the confidentiality of their information. Moreover, the subjects were free to withdraw from the study at any time, and the results of the study would be available to them if desired.
The authors would like to express their gratitude to the participants, who greatly cooperated with this study. The authors would also like to appreciate the assistance of all the loved ones contributing to the present study.
Authors' contributions
Conceptualization (Oldouz Mokhtarinejad); Methodology (Bahram Mirzaian); Investigation (Bahram Mirzaian); Writing original draft (Ramezan Hassanzadeh); Writing, Reviewing, and Editing (all authors); Funding acquisition (all authors); Resources (all authors); Supervision (Bahram Mirzaian)
The current study did not receive any specific grant from funding agencies in public, commercial, or not-for-profit sectors.
Conflicts of Interest
The authors declare that there is no conflict of interest.
  1. Tyrer P, Cooper S, Crawford M, Dupont S, Green J, Murphy D, et al. Prevalence of health anxiety problems in medical clinics. Journal of Psychosomatic Research. 2011; 71(6):392-4. [DOI:10.1016/j.jpsychores.2011.07.004] [PMID]
  2. McDaniel SH, Grus CL, Cubic BA, Hunter CL, Kearney LK, Schuman CC, et al. Competencies for psychology practice in primary care. American Psychologist. 2014; 69(4):409-29. [DOI:10.1037/a0036072] [PMID]
  3. Longley SL, Broman-Fulks JJ, Calamari JE, Noyes R, Wade M, Orlando CM. A taxometric study of hypochondriasis symptoms. Behavior Therapy. 2010; 41(4):505-14. [DOI:10.1016/j.beth.2010.02.002] [PMID]
  4. Vitasari P, Wahab MN, Herawan T, Othman A, Sinnadurai SK. Re-test of State Trait Anxiety Inventory (STAI) among engineering students in Malaysia: reliability and validity tests. Procedia-Social and Behavioral Sciences. 2011; 15:3843-8. [DOI:10.1016/j.sbspro.2011.04.383]
  5. Fassbinder E, Assmann N, Schaich A, Heinecke K, Wagner T, Sipos V, et al. PRO*BPD: effectiveness of outpatient treatment programs for borderline personality disorder: a comparison of Schema therapy and dialectical behavior therapy: study protocol for a randomized trial. BMC Psychiatry. 2018; 18(1):341. [DOI:10.1186/s12888-018-1905-6] [PMID] [PMCID]
  6. Jagiellowicz J, Xu X, Aron A, Aron E, Cao G, Feng T, et al. The trait of sensory processing sensitivity and neural responses to changes in visual scenes. Social Cognitive and Affective Neuroscience. 2011; 6(1):38-47. [DOI:10.1093/
    [PMID] [PMCID]
  7. Boterberg S, Warreyn P. Making sense of it all: the impact of sensory processing sensitivity on daily functioning of children. Personality and Individual Differences. 2016; 92:80-6. [DOI:10.1016/j.paid.2015.12.022]
  8. Summerfeldt LJ, Kloosterman PH, Antony MM, Swinson RP. Examining an obsessive-compulsive core dimensions model: Structural validity of harm avoidance and incompleteness. Journal of Obsessive-Compulsive and Related Disorders. 2014; 3(2):83-94. [DOI:10.1016/j.jocrd.2014.01.003]
  9. Hansenne M, Reggers J, Pinto E, Kjiri K, Ajamier A, Ansseau M. Temperament and character inventory (TCI) and depression. Journal of Psychiatric Research. 1999; 33(1):31-6. [DOI:10.1016/s0022-3956(98)00036-3] [PMID]
  10. Gross JJ. Emotion regulation: taking stock and moving forward. Emotion. 2013; 13(3):359-65. [DOI:10.1037/
  11. Khaleghi M, Leahy RL, Akbari E, Mohammadkhani S, Hasani J, Tayyebi A. Emotional schema therapy for generalized anxiety disorder: a single-subject design. International Journal of Cognitive Therapy. 2017; 10(4):269-82. [DOI:10.1521/ijct.2017.10.4.269]
  12. Biglan A, Hayes SC, Pistorello J. Acceptance and commitment: implications for prevention science. Prevention Science. 2008; 9(3):139-52. [DOI:10.1007/
    [PMID] [PMCID]
  13. Hayes SC. Acceptance and commitment therapy relational frame theory, and the third wave of behavioral and cognitive therapies. Behavior Therapy. 2004; 35(4):639-65. [DOI:10.1016/S0005-7894(04)80013-3]
  14. Garnefski N, Kraaij V. Cognitive emotion regulation questionnaire-development of a short 18-item version (CERQ-short). Personality and Individual Differences. 2006; 41(6):1045-53. [DOI:10.1016/j.paid.2006.04.010]
  15. Schaap GM, Chakhssi F, Westerhof GJ. Inpatient schema therapy for nonresponsive patients with personality pathology: Changes in symptomatic distress, schemas, schema modes, coping styles, experienced parenting styles, and mental well-being. Psychotherapy. 2016; 53(4):402-12. [DOI:10.1037/pst0000056] [PMID]
  16. Street RL Jr, Haidet P. How well do doctors know their patients? Factors affecting physician understanding of patients' health beliefs. Journal of General Internal Medicine. 2011; 26(1):21-7. [DOI:10.1007/s11606-010-1453-3] [PMID] [PMCID]
  17. Fergus TA, Kelley LP, Griggs JO. The combination of health anxiety and somatic symptoms: Specificity to anxiety sensitivity cognitive concerns among patients in primary care. Psychiatry Research. 2016; 239:117-21. [DOI:10.1016/
  18. Rezaei M, Ghazanfari F. The role of childhood trauma, early maladaptive schemas, emotional schemas and experimental avoidance on depression: a structural equation modeling. Psychiatry Research. 2016; 246:407-14. [DOI:10.1016/
  19. Spidel A, Lecomte T, Kealy D, Daigneault I. Acceptance and commitment therapy for psychosis and trauma: improvement in psychiatric symptoms, emotion regulation, and treatment compliance following a brief group intervention. Psychology and Psychotherapy: Theory, Research and Practice. 2018; 91(2):248-61. [DOI:10.1111/
  20. Burckhardt R, Manicavasagar V, Batterham PJ, Hadzi-Pavlovic D. A randomized controlled trial of strong minds: a school-based mental health program combining acceptance and commitment therapy and positive psychology. Journal of School Psychology. 2016; 57:41-52. [DOI:10.1016/j.jsp.2016.05.008] [PMID]
  21. Khazraee H, Omidi A, Kakhki RD, Zanjani Z, Sehat M. Effectiveness of acceptance and commitment therapy in cognitive emotion regulation strategies, headache-related disability, and headache intensity in patients with chronic daily headache. Iranian Red Crescent Medical Journal. 2018; 20(S1):e57151. [DOI:10.5812/ircmj.57151]
  22. Yaraghchi A, Jomehri F, Seyrafi M, Kraskian Mujembari A, Mohammadi Farsani G. The effectiveness of acceptance and commitment therapy on weight loss and cognitive emotion regulation in obese individuals. Iranian Journal of Health Education and Health Promotion. 2019; 7(2):192-201. [DOI:10.30699/ijhehp.7.2.192]
  23. Morvaridi M, Mashhadi A, Shamloo ZS, Leahy RL. The effectiveness of group emotional schema therapy on emotional regulation and social anxiety symptoms. International Journal of Cognitive Therapy. 2019; 12(1):16-24. [DOI:10.1007/s41811-018-0037-6]
  24. Hayes SC. Acceptance and commitment therapy, relational frame theory, and the third wave of behavioral and cognitive therapies-republished article. Behavior Therapy. 2016; 47(6):869-85. [DOI:10.1016/j.beth.2016.11.006] [PMID]
  25. Dadomo H, Grecucci A, Giardini I, Ugolini E, Carmelita A, Panzeri M. Schema therapy for emotional dysregulation: theoretical implication and clinical applications. Frontiers in Psychology. 2016; 7:1987. [DOI:10.3389/fpsyg.2016.01987] [PMID] [PMCID]
  26. Daneshmandi S, Izadikhah Z, Wilson LA, Forooshani S. Emotional schema therapy improves emotion regulation in individuals with a history of child abuse and neglect. International Journal of Cognitive Therapy. 2019; 12(1):5-15. [DOI:10.1007/s41811-018-0036-7]
  27. Shahsavani S, Mashhadi A, Bigdeli I. The effect of group emotional schema therapy on cognitive emotion strategies in women with migraine headaches: a pilot study. International Journal of Cognitive Therapy. 2020; 8:1-3. [DOI:10.1007/s41811-020-00073-8]

Article Type: Research Article | Subject: Anxiety and Stress
Received: 2020/05/16 | Accepted: 2020/06/25 | Published: 2020/11/16

Add your comments about this article : Your username or Email:

Send email to the article author

Rights and permissions
Creative Commons License This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.

© 2024 CC BY 4.0 | Avicenna Journal of Neuro Psycho Physiology

Designed & Developed by : Yektaweb