Volume 6, Issue 4 (November 2019)                   Avicenna J Neuro Psycho Physiology 2019, 6(4): 195-202 | Back to browse issues page

XML Print

Download citation:
BibTeX | RIS | EndNote | Medlars | ProCite | Reference Manager | RefWorks
Send citation to:

Ghorbani Amir H A, Moradi O, Arefi M, Ahmadian H. The Effectiveness of Acceptance and Commitment Therapy on Cognitive-Emotional Regulation, Resilience, and Self-control Strategies in Divorced Women. Avicenna J Neuro Psycho Physiology 2019; 6 (4) :195-202
URL: http://ajnpp.umsha.ac.ir/article-1-196-en.html
1- Department of Psychology, Islamic Azad University, Sanandaj Branch, Sanandaj, Iran.
2- Department of Psychology, Islamic Azad University, Sanandaj Branch, Sanandaj, Iran. , o.moradi@iausdj.ac.ir
Full-Text [PDF 622 kb]   (1610 Downloads)     |   Abstract (HTML)  (3441 Views)
Full-Text:   (2639 Views)


Divorce is associated with emotional problems affecting the family’s well-being, as a social institution. It doubles the vulnerability of individuals, especially women to physical and psychological problems [1]. It has shown linked to the serious family communication problem, and Iran is one of the first seven countries worldwide in terms of the divorce/marriage ratio [2]. Divorce and its consequences raise many social and individual challenges for divorced women affecting their mental and general health and causing problems in their personal lives and businesses [3]. After divorce, divorced women face the loss of emotional regulation and they have a lower level of mental health and emotional regulation [4]. 

Emotion regulation is viewed as higher cognitive activity of an individual while facing adverse events in social life [5]. High emotional intensity is the repeated and serious experience of negative emotions and emotional reactions that occur extremely, easily, and quickly [6]. High emotional intensity cannot cause serious problems; however, it reduces the likelihood of successful emotion management [7]. Regarding a severe emotional state, a more inclusive strategy is needed to control the situation, and without such skills, emotional processes are ineffective and fail [8]. On the other hand, in recent years, approaches addressing human capacities and abilities rather than abnormalities and disorders have been widely considered by the counselors and psychologists. Increasing resilience is one of the most fundamental structures of these approaches to coping with the consequences of divorce [9]. 

Psychological resilience is defined as the dynamic process of positive adapting and adjusting to undesirable and unpleasant experiences in life that leads to a successful adaptation or performance facing stressful situations to make a balance between on such occasions. Also, resilience can help protect people against depression and anxiety [10]. It is a stable trajectory against the threat of adverse events, active and efficient participation in the environment. Resilience refers to one’s ability to strike a bio-psychological balance against threatening events [11]. 

Individuals need a balance between traumatic problems and events to end their marriages and start a new life. Self-control is one of the strategies to help in this situation. Self-control at any level has the intrapersonal and interpersonal dimensions. Weak self-control resulting from a dysfunctional family and inadequate socialization associated with behavioral disorders, such as low self-esteem, low conscience, low internal control, and a sense of helplessness reveals its intrapersonal dimension. Also considering weak self-control along with behavioral disorders, like expressing anger, hastiness, egocentrism, lack of empathy, risk-taking, delinquency, and impulsive behaviors indicates its interpersonal dimension [12].

Self-control is the person’s ability to recognize and use his talents to control his and others’ emotions, behaviors, and needs. General self-control has shown resulting from the intrapersonal, interpersonal, and self-report factors [13]. Acceptance and Commitment Therapy (ACT) is one of the group interventions that can be very effective in reducing problems faced by divorced women to improve self-control. ACT is grounded in functional contextualism based on the relational frame theory. In this approach, human suffering comes from his psychological inflexibility, which is reinforced by cognitive amalgamation and experiential avoidance. In this regard, people try to avoid or change several disturbing emotions, feelings, or thoughts. While these efforts are ineffective and in a contradictory pattern, they intensify feelings, emotions, and thoughts that one has attempted to avoid [14].

In this approach, psychological flexibility is targeted through the six processes of acceptance, defusion, contacting the present moment, self as context, values, and committed action. Psychological flexibility means that one can live in the present moment rather than drowning in the past and the future, and identify their values and goals and also instead of avoiding disturbing thoughts, feelings, memories, or desires, adopt a behavior consistent with his values and goals [15].

ACT has shown effective in increasing marital satisfaction, reducing interpersonal and psychological anxiety, depression, and suicidal ideation, and also acceptance of pain and pain-related anxiety, improving Obsessive-Compulsive Disorder (OCD), and quality of life [16-21]. 

Each year, several married women end their marriage and have to endure a wide range of changes in their lives and new emotional adjustments. Therefore, studies and interventions aiming at improving their emotional well-being probably can prevent more severe personal and social harm to this group. No study has yet been done to compare the effectiveness of ACT-based intervention on cognitive emotion regulation strategies resilience, and self-control of divorced women. Accordingly, the present study aimed at determining the effectiveness of ACT on cognitive emotion regulation, resilience, and self-control strategies in divorced women.

Materials and Methods

The present quasi-experimental study with a pre-test and post-test with a control group was conducted on all divorced women referring to the Justice Counseling Center in Babol, Iran in the second half of the year 2017 and the first half of the year 2018. The samples (60 cases) were selected using the available sampling method and randomly divided into the experimental and control groups. For initial screening, of 162 people who answered the resilience and self-control questionnaire, 83 cases had resilience (scored below 50) and self-control (scored below 37), of whom 60 cases were selected and assigned in two groups (30 cases per group) to attend weekly training sessions.

Based on the effect size of 0.25, alpha of 0.05, and the test power of 0.80, the minimum number of samples to achieve the desired power was 30 samples in each group and 60 in total. Inclusion criteria were being divorced in the last year, female gender, and no other serious mental disorders, such as schizophrenia and bipolar disorder and the exclusion criteria were being absent for more than two sessions, physical disability, and providing incomplete information. Before the intervention, both groups received emotion regulation, resilience, and self-control strategies tests. The experimental group was then subjected to the ACT for eight 90-min sessions weekly, whereas the control group received no training. To evaluate the effect of training, again, the tests were resubmitted to both groups by the researcher. 

The ethical considerations were observed in this study. The participation was completely voluntary. The subjects were informed about the objects and rules of the research and their attitudes and opinions were respected. All subjects were allowed to withdraw the research at any stage. Also, the control group had the chance to receive the ACT sessions after the study. All documents, questionnaires, and records remained confidential and only for research purposes. Written informed consent was obtained from all volunteers.

Cognitive Emotion Regulation Questionnaire (CERQ)

CERQ includes nine sub-scales and 36 items developed by Garnefski et al. as a multidimensional questionnaire to identify cognitive coping strategies after experiencing adverse events or situations. The components of cognitive regulation strategies of positive emotion are acceptance, positive focusing, focus on planning, positive reassessment, and perspective acceptance. Components of cognitive regulation strategies of negative emotion are self-blame, blaming others, rumination, and catastrophization. Each subscale has six items scored on a 5-point scale (always, often, usually, sometimes, and never). The higher score on each subscale indicates the higher use of a specific cognitive strategy. Regarding the reliability of the CERQ, Garnefski et al. reported Cronbach’s alpha of 0.91 for positive strategies, 0.87 for negative strategies, and 0.93 for the whole questionnaire [22]. The subscales of the Persian version of the CERQ also had a good internal consistency (Cronbach’s alpha of 0.76 to 0.92). The components and overall subscales scores were significantly correlated (r=0.46 to r=0.75) and the obtained retest correlation coefficient value (0.51 to 0.77) indicated the scale stability [22]. In this study, the validity and reliability of this questionnaire were 0.73 and 0.79, respectively.

The Connor-Davidson Resilience Scale (CD-RISC)

CD-RISC is a 25-item scale developed by Conner and Davidson (scored on a 5-point scale ranging from zero (completely false) to four (always true) [23]. To determine the validity of this scale, the correlation of each item with the total score of the items was first calculated, followed by using the factor analysis. The correlation of each score with the total score, except for item 3, showed its coefficients between 0.41 and 0.64. Then, using factor analysis, the scale items were analyzed with the principal component analysis model. Before extracting the factors based on the correlational matrix of items, the Kaiser-Meyer-Olkin value was 0/87 and the two Chi value in Bartlett’s test was 5556/28, indicating the adequacy of factor analysis [23]. In the present study, the validity and reliability of the CD-RISC were 0.78 and 0.82, respectively.

Self-control Questionnaire

This questionnaire was developed by Tangney et al. and consisted of 13 items [24]. It is scored on a 5-point Likert scale (1=“does not apply to me at all, 2=applies to me to some degree, 3=sometimes it applies to me, 4=most of the time, it applies to me, and 5=it always applies to me. Questions 2, 3, 4, 5, 7, 9, 10, 12, and 13 are scored inversely. Tangney et al. [24] reported the reliability of 0.91 for this questionnaire and in another research, its reliability using Cronbach’s alpha was obtained 0.80 [25]. In the current study, the validity and reliability of the questionnaire were 0.86 and 0.89, respectively. 

After sampling, the subjects were assigned in the control and experimental groups and the pre-test was conducted for both groups. The experimental group was then subjected to the ACT-based intervention [26] in eight 90-min sessions once a day weekly. No intervention was conducted for the control group. After the intervention, the post-test stage was conducted. The treatment plan of the experimental group is summarized in Table 1.

Data were analyzed using SPSS software V. 22 and descriptive and inferential statistics. Mean and standard deviation were used to describe the data, and in inferential analysis, after testing the validity of the assumptions, the One-Way Analysis of Covariance (ANCOVA) was applied.


The mean age of the experimental and control groups was 34.7 (5.4) and 35.1 (6.7) years, respectively, and both groups were homogenized for age.

The Shapiro-Wilk and Kolmogorov-Smirnov test confirmed the normal distribution of data (P<0.05). Also, the equality of variances and mean assumptions in the pre-test stage were approved (P<0.05). The assumption of homogeneity of variances was confirmed during the study (P<0.05). Furthermore, the assumption of linearity between pre-test and post-test was significant (P<0.05). In examining the assumption of homogeneity of the slope of the regression line, all traits were investigated. The results confirmed the homogeneity of the slope of the regression line so that the F-value regarding the interaction effect of the pre-test score and group was not significant (P<0.05).


The obtained results revealed that ACT was effective in positive emotion regulation, negative emotion regulation, resilience, and self-control. The mean scores of the positive and negative emotion regulation, resilience, and self-control in the pre-test and post-test of the control group showed no significant differences. These findings are consistent with the results reported by Norte et al. [27], McCracken et al. [28], and Asanjarani et al. [29].

In explaining the findings, it can be said that cognitive emotional regulation reduced negative emotions and increased positive emotions and adaptive behavior of divorced women. Therefore, using ACT, divorced women use emotions correctly and can be informed about the sensations and accept them. Expressing emotions, especially positive emotions in life situations reduces negative emotions, and consequently, the adaptation level of divorced women in terms of socio-emotional adjustment skill can be improved.

In other words, divorced women are unaware of their positive and negative emotions and cannot use them accurately in their life situations because their psychological problems make them evaluate themselves negatively and do not use their strategies to cope with the problems. However, training the components of ACT makes the divorced women aware of the negative emotions and their negative influence on themselves and by reassessing emotions in different situations, they try to keep healthy emotions leading to reduced mental problems. Concerning the effect of ACT on cognitive emotion regulation strategies in women, McCracken et al. [28] and Asanjarani et al. [29] believed that training the strategies to avoid or control unpleasant and unwanted mental experiences to people with low emotional regulation while attending the training sessions of ACT not only is ineffective but also has the opposite effect and exacerbate their stress. Therefore, women are helped to experience disturbing thoughts merely as a thought and become aware of their consequences and nature. They are also encouraged to do useful activities consistent with their values instead of responding to these thoughts. Accordingly, they gradually can focus on their activities, goals, and plans and achieve positive and favorable emotional outcomes.

ACT through its components helps divorced women to pay full attention to existing situations without judgment because one of the reasons that negatively affect the mental health of divorced women is the feelings of guilt and failure. Applying the ACT-based intervention due to its underlying strategies, such as the acceptation, increasing awareness, desensitization, living at the moment, observing without judgment, and encountering can increase resilience while reducing psychological symptoms. Divorced women who received coping skills training can cope with stressful events with optimism and confidence, and in general, they use their information processing systems more efficiently [29].

The effectiveness of ACT-based training to improve coping skills can be due to the mediating role of its therapeutic processes. Through the ACT process, an alternative is presented to deal with the events; for example, willingness and acceptance are introduced as the alternatives to avoidance. The willingness and acceptance components make it possible for the person to accept unpleasant internal experiences without attempting to control them. It makes unpleasant experiences seem less uncontrollable with lower impacts on his life. The processes of mindfulness used in this treatment cause remarkable changes in the subject’s attention. In other words, it drives attention to provide insights into mental events that allow one to observe mental events instead of considering them as a part of his existence [30, 31].

This study had some limitations that should be considered for generalizing the results. The present study was conducted on divorced women referring to the Justice Counseling Center in Babol, therefore, the results cannot be generalized to other cities and regions. Also, due to the time limit and lack of access to the subjects, the follow-up stage was not performed. It is suggested to compare the effectiveness of cognitive-behavioral therapy with other therapeutic approaches to provide a clearer picture of the effectiveness of this treatment according to Iran’s cultural context. Performing the follow-up stage after treatment to evaluate the long-term effects of ACT, stabilization of the last training sessions, and finally considering reminder sessions are recommended after the end of the treatment period to prevent the loss of treatment effects.


The obtained results showed that ACT led to an increase in positive cognitive regulation, resilience, self-control, and a decrease in negative cognitive regulation in divorced women.

Ethical Considerations

Compliance with ethical guidelines

All ethical principles were considered in this article. The participants were informed about the purpose of the research and its implementation stages and signed the informed consent. They were also assured of the confidentiality of their information. Moreover, they were allowed to leave the study whenever they wish, and if desired, and the results of the research would be available to them. 


This article was extracted from a PhD. thesis of first author in Counseling at the Islamic Azad University, Sanandaj Branch and approved by the Ethics Committee of the Kurdistan University of Medical Sciences (Code: IR.MUK.REC.1397.391).

Authors' contributions

All authors contributed equally in preparing all parts of the research.

Conflict of interest

The authors declared no conflict of interest.



1.Lavelle B, Smock PJ. Divorce and women’s risk of health insurance loss. Journal of Health and Social Behavior. 2012; 53(4):413-31. [DOI:10.1177/0022146512465758] [PMID] [PMCID] 

2.McGregor BA, Dolan ED, Murphy KM, Sannes TS, Highland KB, Albano DL, et al. Cognitive behavioral stress management for healthy women at risk for breast cancer: A novel application of a proven intervention. Annals of Behavioral Medicine. 2015; 49(6):873-84. [DOI:10.1007/s12160-015-9726-z] [PMID] [PMCID] 

3.Ghulam A, Beshlideh K. [Effectiveness of spirituality therapy on mental health of divorced women (Persian)]. Family Counseling and Psychotherapy. 2011; 1(3):331-48. 

4.Dickerson JF, Lynch FL, Leo MC, DeBar LL, Pearson J, Clarke GN. Cost-effectiveness of cognitive behavioral therapy for depressed youth declining antidepressants. Pediatrics. 2018; 141(2):e20171969. [DOI:10.1542/peds.2017-1969] [PMID] [PMCID] 

5.Weiss B, Lavner JA, Miller JD. Self-and partner-reported psychopathic traits’ relations with couples’ communication, marital satisfaction trajectories, and divorce in a longitudinal sample. Personality Disorders: Theory, Research, and Treatment. 2018; 9(3):239-49. [DOI:10.1037/per0000233] [PMID] [PMCID] 

6.Johnsen TJ, Friborg O. The effects of cognitive behavioral therapy as an anti-depressive treatment is falling: A meta-analysis. Psychological Bulletin. 2015; 141(4):747-68. [DOI:10.1037/bul0000015] [PMID] 

7.Quoidbach J, Mikolajczak M, Gross JJ. Positive interventions: An emotion regulation perspective. Psychological Bulletin. 2015; 141(3):655-93. [DOI:10.1037/a0038648] [PMID] 

8.Blanco-Donoso LM, Garrosa E, Demerouti E, Moreno-Jiménez B. Job resources and recovery experiences to face difficulties in emotion regulation at work: A diary study among nurses. International Journal of Stress Management. 2017; 24(2):107. [DOI:10.1037/str0000023] 

9.Jelvani R, Etemadi O, Jazayeri R, Fatehizade M. Difficulties in Emotion regulation among Iranian remarried women: The role of mindfulness, thought-action fusion, and emotion regulation. Journal of Divorce & Remarriage. 2019; 60(2):89-103. [DOI:10.1080/10502556.2018.1488112] 

10.Tsirigotis K, Łuczak J. Resilience in women who experience domestic violence. Psychiatric Quarterly. 2018; 89(1):201-11. [DOI:10.1007/s11126-017-9529-4] [PMID] [PMCID] 

11.Reyes AT, Constantino RE. Asian American women’s resilience: An integrative review. Asian/Pacific Island Nursing Journal. 2016; 1(3):105-15. [DOI:10.9741/23736658.1048] 

12.Subramaniam S, Camacho LM, Carolan MT, López-Zerón G. Resilience in low-income African American women living and aging with HIV. Journal of Women & Aging. 2017; 29(6):543-50

13.Schaan VK, Vögele C. Resilience and rejection sensitivity mediate long-term outcomes of parental divorce. European Child & Adolescent Psychiatry. 2016; 25(11):1267-9. [DOI:10.1007/s00787-016-0893-7] [PMID] 

14.Garrido-Rojas L, Guzmán-González M, Mendoza-Llanos R, Rivera-Ottenberger D, Contreras-Garay P. Emotional regulation and depression in a sample of separated and divorced Chilean adults. Current Psychology. 2019; 1-2. [DOI:10.1007/s12144-018-0103-5] 

15.Shimkowski JR, Ledbetter AM. Parental divorce disclosures, young adults’ emotion regulation strategies, and feeling caught. Journal of Family Communication. 2018; 18(3):185-201. [DOI:10.1080/15267431.2018.1457033] 

16.Garnefski N, Kraaij V, Spinhoven P. Negative life events, cognitive emotion regulation and emotional problems. Personal Individual Differences. 2001; 30(8):1311-27. [DOI:10.1016/S0191-8869(00)00113-6] 

17.Kraaij V, Garnefski N. The behavioral emotion regulation questionnaire: Development, psychometric properties and relationships with emotional problems and the cognitive emotion regulation questionnaire. Personality and Individual Differences. 2019; 137:56-61. [DOI:10.1016/j.paid.2018.07.036] 

18.Connor KM, Davidson JR. Development of a new resilience scale: The Connor-Davidson Resilience Scale (CD-RISC). Depress Anxiety 2003; 18(2):76-82. [DOI:10.1002/da.10113] [PMID] 

19.Tangney JP, Baumeister RF, Boone AL. High self-control predicts good adjustment, less pathology, better grades, and interpersonal success. Journal of Personality. 2004; 72(2):272-324. [DOI:10.1111/j.0022-3506.2004.00263.x] [PMID] 

20.Norona JC, Scharf M, Welsh DP, Shulman S. Predicting post-breakup distress and growth in emerging adulthood: The roles of relationship satisfaction and emotion regulation. Journal of Adolescence. 2018; 63:191-3. [DOI:10.1016/j.adolescence.2018.01.001] [PMID] 

21.Azimi M, Moradi A, Hasani J. Effectiveness of cognitive behavioral therapy (face to face and Internet-based) on Emotional Regulation Strategies of individuals with Comorbidity of insomnia and depression. Research in Psychological Health. 2017; 11(1):49-61. [DOI:10.29252/rph.11.1.49] 

22.Bohlmeijer ET, Fledderus M, Rokx TA, Pieterse ME. Efficacy of an early intervention based on acceptance and commitment therapy for adults with depressive symptomatology: Evaluation in a randomized controlled trial. Behaviour Research and Therapy. 2011; 49(1):62-7. [DOI:10.1016/j.brat.2010.10.003] [PMID] 

23.Spidel A, Lecomte T, Kealy D, Daigneault I. Acceptance and commitment therapy for psychosis and trauma: Improvement in psychiatric symptoms, emotion regulation, and treatment compliance following a brief group intervention. Psychology and Psychotherapy: Theory, Research and Practice. 2018; 91(2):248-61. [DOI:10.1111/papt.12159] [PMID] 

24.Charmchi N, Asgari P, Hafezi F, Makvandi B, BakhtiarPour S. The effect of “Cognitive Behavior Therapy” in method group on anxiety and psychological resilience of menopausal women. Journal of Health Promotion Management. 2016; 5(5):15-22. [DOI:10.21859/jhpm-06013] 

25.Lanza PV, Garcia PF, Lamelas FR, González‐Menéndez A. Acceptance and commitment therapy versus cognitive behavioral therapy in the treatment of substance use disorder with incarcerated women. Journal of Clinical Psychology. 2014; 70(7):644-57. [DOI:10.1002/jclp.22060] [PMID] 

26.Hayes SC, Strosahl KD, Bunting K, Twohig M, Wilson KG. What is acceptance and commitment therapy? A practical guide to acceptance and commitment therapy. Boston: Springer; 2004. [DOI:10.1007/978-0-387-23369-7_1] 

27.Norte CE, Souza GGL, Pedrozo AL, Mendonça-de-Souza ACF, Figueira I, Volchan E, et al. Impact of cognitive-behavior therapy on resilience-related neurobiological factors. Archives of Clinical Psychiatry (São Paulo). 2011; 38(1):43-5. [DOI:10.1590/S0101-60832011000100009] 

28.McCracken LM, Gutiérrez-Martínez O. Processes of change in psychological flexibility in an interdisciplinary group-based treatment for chronic pain based on Acceptance and Commitment Therapy. Behaviour Research and Therapy. 2011; 49(4):267-74. [DOI:10.1016/j.brat.2011.02.004] [PMID] 

29.Asanjarani F, Jazayeri R, Fatehizade M, Etemadi O, De Mol J. The effectiveness of Fisher’s rebuilding group intervention on divorce adjustment and general health of Iranian divorced women. Journal of Divorce & Remarriage. 2018; 59(2):108-22. [DOI:10.1080/10502556.2017.1375334] 

30.Koochaki M, Mahmoodi Z, Esmaelzadeh-Saeieh S, Kabir K, Tehranizadeh M, Dolatian M. The effect of cognitive-behavioral counseling on anxiety in the mothers of infants in the NICU: A randomized controlled trial. F1000Research. 2017; 6:1679 [DOI:10.12688/f1000research.12539.1] [PMID] [PMCID] 

31.García Y, Ferrás C, Aguilera A, Ávila P. Usability and feasibility study of a remote cognitive behavioral therapy system with long-term unemployed women. Journal of Technology in Human Services. 2017; 35(3):219-30. [DOI:10.1080/15228835.2017.1345672] 

Article Type: Research Article | Subject: Health Education and Promotion
Received: 2019/03/19 | Accepted: 2019/11/9 | Published: 2019/11/1

Add your comments about this article : Your username or Email:

Send email to the article author

Rights and permissions
Creative Commons License This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.

© 2024 CC BY 4.0 | Avicenna Journal of Neuro Psycho Physiology

Designed & Developed by : Yektaweb